Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Another\s+Solar\s+Panel\s+RFI\s+Victim\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Another\s+Solar\s+Panel\s+RFI\s+Victim\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI Victim (score: 1): Author: Tony <73guddx@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 20:16:48 -0500; All: A few years ago, I posted a video on solar panel RFI and it's affect on HF. Since then, I've heard from many hams who've experienced the same issue. Most send emails but a few post comments on m; /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00000.html (7,136 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI Victim (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 09:35:27 -0500; I'm just curious - have you contacted the FCC., or has the ARRL done so? This seems like a clear case of SolarEdge violating emission limits, which they are supposed to care about. 73, Pete N4ZR One; /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00001.html (8,508 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI Victim (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 14:57:18 +0000; On what basis do you believe that the SE equipment is in violation of the emissions limits, Pete? The FCC rules set limits on radiated emissions above 30 MHz and on emissions conducted onto the AC ma; /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00002.html (10,744 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI Victim (score: 1): Author: Dan K2YWE <dan.k2ywe@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 09:59:55 -0500; BTW Have you seen this? A bit of a peek into SolarEdge's ethics. https://www.krqe.com/business/press-releases/cision/20221205NY54152/class-action-alert-the-law-offices-of-vincent-wong-remind-solaredg; /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00003.html (12,130 bytes)
5. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI Victim (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 15:09:36 +0000; "SolarEdge and Ampt have been litigating a dispute involving a patent family filed by SolarEdge and a patent family filed by Ampt before the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for many years, Sol; /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00004.html (13,963 bytes)
6. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI Victim (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 15:18:22 +0000; To quite a bit of good effect, Tony. First, cases do get resolved and to date, Solar Edge has replaced complete systems in about 500 cases nationwide, many of which involve amateur radio. There is n; /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00005.html (11,339 bytes)
7. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI Victim (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 15:26:08 +0000; There is an important factor here to keep in mind. PV systems are regulated by Part 15 of the FCC's rules. Under those rules, the manufacturers of devices that generate RF noise are required to do th; /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00006.html (10,259 bytes)
8. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI Victim (score: 1): Author: James Gordon Beattie Jr <w2ttt@att.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 15:33:39 +0000; Ed, I think you're raising the point that the current standards for radiated and conducted emissions are seemingly inadequate and need to be revisited. Naturally, equipment vendors and manufacturers; /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00007.html (12,146 bytes)
9. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI Victim (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 12:43:56 -0500; My mistake, Ed. I'd forgotten the "above 30 MHz" limitation on radiated emissions. 73, Pete N4ZR One of the RBN team On 12/12/2022 9:57 AM, Hare, Ed, W1RFI wrote: On what basis do you believe that t; /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00008.html (11,409 bytes)
10. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI Victim (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 17:45:44 +0000; No problem. Pete. I just see this one repeated often, until it takes on a life of its own. Even above 30 MHz, a legal emission could be as much as S9 to a nearby amateurs. My mistake, Ed. I'd forgott; /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00009.html (12,129 bytes)
11. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI Victim (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 18:08:12 +0000; This sounds good in theory, Gordon, but in reality, it is never going to happen to a level good enough to truly protect amateur radio. "Push back" would be too mild of a term and the US regulations a; /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00010.html (16,181 bytes)
12. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI Victim (score: 1): Author: James Gordon Beattie Jr <w2ttt@att.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 18:23:48 +0000; Ed, Two things to consider here: As you pointed out the FCC can and does often address the effect of harmful interference and that was my point in saying, "quantified measurements and their effects".; /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00011.html (17,463 bytes)
13. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI Victim (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 18:50:37 +0000; The AM broadcasters are somewhat concerned, but not to the point where their organizations throw the level of resources that ARRL expends on these issues. In most cases, ARRL is not only the only ent; /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00012.html (18,901 bytes)
14. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI Victim (score: 1): Author: James Gordon Beattie Jr <w2ttt@att.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 19:49:16 +0000; Ed, I've had to deconflict switched mode power supply issues anywhere from 144 to 800 MHz where interference was noted in Public Safety, Amateur Radio, and cellular services. AM broadcasters in parti; /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00013.html (20,458 bytes)
15. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI Victim (score: 1): Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 08:20:29 -0600; You can leap to the defense of Solar Edge and that's all well and good. Everyone should have an advocate. But I've been following this issue since it began, here on this email list and elsewhere, and; /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00014.html (8,296 bytes)
16. Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI Victim (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 11:06:59 -0500; It would be interesting to know what their share of the US residential market is, to help explain what these numbers mean. 73, Pete N4ZR One of the RBN team On 12/13/2022 9:20 AM, Rob Atkinson wrote:; /archives//html/RFI/2022-12/msg00015.html (8,938 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]