Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+ARRL\s+Board\s+of\s+Directors\s+resolution\s+related\s+to\s+FCC\s+enforcement\s+of\s+radio\-interference\s+issues\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RFI] ARRL Board of Directors resolution related to FCC enforcement of radio-interference issues (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:54:49 -0400
Your prediction is quite timely and accurate: They are back. http://www.insidegnss.com/node/4437 Like a virus or some relatives, they never seem to be gone for long. Their return does not bode well f
/archives//html/RFI/2015-08/msg00029.html (15,594 bytes)

22. Re: [RFI] ARRL Board of Directors resolution related to FCC enforcement of radio-interference issues (score: 1)
Author: "qrv@kd4e.com" <qrv@kd4e.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 22:04:04 -0400
I respectfully request that you follow the money to understand why this group has access to the FCC. It's mostly partisan but not entirely. Contact your Congressmen - House & Senate, and let them kno
/archives//html/RFI/2015-08/msg00030.html (14,235 bytes)

23. Re: [RFI] ARRL Board of Directors resolution related to FCC enforcement of radio-interference issues (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 22:31:08 -0700
Ed, While I greatly appreciate and respect your efforts and those of the rest of the League, I must strongly disagree. It was only last month that a bunch of FCC Field offices were shut down, and it'
/archives//html/RFI/2015-08/msg00032.html (11,383 bytes)

24. Re: [RFI] ARRL Board of Directors resolution related to FCC enforcement of radio-interference issues (score: 1)
Author: dalej <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 02:37:18 -0500
"The company also wanted a complete set of data with the names of the manufacturers of each receiver a change in the confidentiality arrangements that governed tests done several years ago when the L
/archives//html/RFI/2015-08/msg00033.html (15,388 bytes)

25. Re: [RFI] ARRL Board of Directors resolution related to FCC enforcement of radio-interference issues (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:27:18 +0000
I don't think that we will ever know the percentage of fines collected, Jim, but for most of the people involved, the fining process probably involves lawyers and a major hassle, and that alone may b
/archives//html/RFI/2015-08/msg00034.html (12,146 bytes)

26. Re: [RFI] ARRL Board of Directors resolution related to FCC enforcement of radio-interference issues (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 18:54:30 -0400
"Is reduced accuracy an actual harm in your mind? asked another attendee." That tells all that know, that attendee has no conception of what is required to fly on instruments, or do an instrument app
/archives//html/RFI/2015-08/msg00037.html (18,235 bytes)

27. Re: [RFI] ARRL Board of Directors resolution related to FCC enforcement of radio-interference issues (score: 1)
Author: dalej <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 18:11:54 -0500
Yes, if it's even a one percent error it is harm. Zero tolerance for error when lives are at stake. Sometimes I wonder, out loud. Dale, k9vuj "Is reduced accuracy an actual harm in your mind? asked a
/archives//html/RFI/2015-08/msg00038.html (19,063 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu