Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w1rfi@arrl.org: 541 ]

Total 541 documents matching your query.

81. RE: [RFI] WWRB (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 22:07:05 -0500
The mix could be in the station equipment, other equipment or corrosion near either transmitter, or your own equipment or station. Much of the "intermod" associated with AM transmitters comes from yo
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00011.html (8,513 bytes)

82. RE: Topband: RE: [RFI] WWRB (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 10:00:30 -0500
Hi, Tom. I missed that it was you! Sorry about that. :-) 73, Ed Hare, W1RFI ARRL Lab 225 Main St Newington, CT 06111 Tel: 860-594-0318 Internet: w1rfi@arrl.org Web: http://www.arrl.org/tis __________
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00015.html (8,550 bytes)

83. RE: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 10:29:47 -0500
73, Ed Hare, W1RFI ARRL Lab 225 Main St Newington, CT 06111 Tel: 860-594-0318 Internet: w1rfi@arrl.org Web: http://www.arrl.org/tis ARRL is the National Association for Amateur Radio. It is supporte
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00022.html (10,175 bytes)

84. RE: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 17:00:17 -0500
Well, it MAY be good news. So far, we haven't had a chance to confirm it one way or the other. I've been kinda' busy with BPL stuff. :-) Tom Frenaye told me today of a newer flat-screen technology th
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00025.html (10,259 bytes)

85. RE: [RFI] RE:[TowerTalk] electric fence qrn (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:09:32 -0500
What most hams report as problems is buzz........buzz, at the PRR. This is almost always caused by defects on the fence itself. Splices that are good enough for the fence to work can be RF noisy. Ga
/archives//html/RFI/2003-12/msg00035.html (8,898 bytes)

86. RE: [RFI] I wish this guy had interviewed Ed Hare also... (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:16:23 -0500
Actually, they did. I was quoted briefly in other versions of the same story. I and others have been sending lots of BPL-article links to the BPLandHamRadio@yahoogroups.com list. Those that are inter
/archives//html/RFI/2004-01/msg00023.html (10,003 bytes)

87. RE: [RFI] I wish this guy had interviewed Ed Hare also... (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:17:46 -0500
Homeplug has put ~30dB notches in the ham bands, except for 5.3 MHz. It is not adaptive. It may offer some protection to some amateur spectrum, but everybody eles's ox, including WWV, aeronautical, S
/archives//html/RFI/2004-01/msg00024.html (10,189 bytes)

88. RE: [RFI] I wish this guy had interviewed Ed Hare also... (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:18:46 -0500
The AMRAD filing documented interference to a HomePlug BPL system in Potomac, MD. 15 watts brought the system down. 73, Ed Hare, W1RFI ARRL Lab 225 Main St Newington, CT 06111 Tel: 860-594-0318 Inter
/archives//html/RFI/2004-01/msg00025.html (11,941 bytes)

89. RE: [RFI] I wish this guy had interviewed Ed Hare also... (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:43:25 -0500
If I recall, it was 15 watts to a mobile antenna parked on the curb outside the house (~12 meters from the house; I have been there myself). 100 watts parked on the curb 1/2 mile away had the same ef
/archives//html/RFI/2004-01/msg00028.html (14,119 bytes)

90. [RFI] EMC active loop antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:02:44 -0500
Do any of you have experience with any particular active HF loop antennas calibrated for EMC measurements? If so, if you have any recommendations for an economical choice, please let me know on this
/archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00060.html (6,954 bytes)

91. RE: [RFI] EMC active loop antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:28:36 -0500
The FCC's assumption of free-space conditions is based on standard methodology. The methods in ANSI C63.4 are similar to those in CISPR-22, etc. Although the FCC rules are expressed in terms of elec
/archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00065.html (12,806 bytes)

92. RE: [RFI] Your Bandpass Filters (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:39:21 -0500
I found the following doing a web search on "Dunestar filter": http://www.k6xx.com/radio/dunestar/ds504.html http://www.k6xx.com/radio/dunestar/ds600.html There were others that appeared in the searc
/archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00117.html (9,188 bytes)

93. RE: [RFI] BPL posts (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:14:58 -0500
The BPLandHamRadio@yahoogroups.com list has been pretty active. Ed Hare, W1RFI ARRL Lab 225 Main St Newington, CT 06111 Tel: 860-594-0318 Internet: w1rfi@arrl.org Web: http://www.arrl.org/tis Member:
/archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00143.html (9,828 bytes)

94. RE: [RFI] re bpl qrm (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 17:22:15 -0500
http://www.arrl.org/~ehare/hyperlinks.html#reports Ed Hare, W1RFI ARRL Lab 225 Main St Newington, CT 06111 Tel: 860-594-0318 Internet: w1rfi@arrl.org Web: http://www.arrl.org/tis Member: IEEE C63 -
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00016.html (9,125 bytes)

95. RE: [RFI] re bpl qrm (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 20:38:10 -0500
As Homer would say, "Doh!" The correct link is http://www.arrl.org/~ehare/bpl/hyperlinks.html#reports <http://www.arrl.org/~ehare/bpl/hyperlinks.html#reports> Sorry about that, folks! 73, Ed, W1RFI -
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00019.html (10,915 bytes)

96. RE: [RFI] Today's Wall Stree Journal front page article on hams & BPL (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:40:56 -0500
The reporter personally saw S9+ noise levels on the mobile transceiver. He personally saw that receiver hearing signals from all over the world as we drove to the test area. He saw that recevier rece
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00126.html (11,049 bytes)

97. RE: [RFI] Today's Wall Stree Journal front page article on hams & BPL (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:35:51 -0500
I have personally visited 6 of the BPL test areas. Though the specifics varied from site to site, all emit strong RF noise continuously across many MHz of spectrum, continuously vs time and across a
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00172.html (9,968 bytes)

98. RE: [RFI] Today's Wall Stree Journal front page article on hams & BPL (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 13:40:25 -0500
The Wall Street Journal article relied heavily on reports about the BPL system in Penn Yan, NY. Here are follow-up articles about Penn Yan: http://www.arrl.org/news/features/2004/04/01/3/?nc=1 http:/
/archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00004.html (8,819 bytes)

99. RE: [RFI] BPL (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 07:59:20 -0400
So, imagine that 100 hams converged on a BPL area to "demonstrate" that the BPL system is susceptible to interference. Does anyone think that the industry would suddenly see the error of their ways a
/archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00056.html (9,102 bytes)

100. RE: [RFI] BPL a backdoor way to fight it (score: 1)
Author: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 16:57:33 -0400
If you share this with them, they will have an unbiased business-case report to think about: <http://intel.si.umich.edu/tprc/papers/2003/246/Tongia-PLC.pdf> Ed I live in an area served by a co-op ele
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00080.html (10,078 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu