Mail Archive Search: <+from:w1rfi@arrl.org>

Results:

References: [ +from:w1rfi@arrl.org: 541 ]

Total 541 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 19:13:12 +0000; I used one of the wayback sites to look to see if Hydrofarm had the product available recently. I didn't find it on their site going back a couple of months, so they may have discontinued being the d; /archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00313.html (16,668 bytes)
182. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 17:38:00 +0000; The FCC already has the right to ask for test data, to test the unit themselves and to determine that those tests are accurate. I am not sure what else you are thinking they should have the right to; /archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00002.html (12,474 bytes)
183. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC II (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 14:10:56 +0000; Like most things at ARRL, Dave, it is a combination of things that come together. The Board sets the policies that are behind this, the League President (Kay Craigie), our counsel (Chris Imlay) and a; /archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00025.html (8,587 bytes)
184. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC.. (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 22:58:29 +0000; I can shed a bit more light on this, I think. Many hams have an image of something that has never existed on a regular basis -- the thought that if they had interference, they could call the FCC, whi; /archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00031.html (15,846 bytes)
185. Re: [RFI] Listen to a Sample of what Plasma TV RFI Sounds Like (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:34:26 +0000; I am thinking that there were a few times that the receiver was tuned. The majority of the changes in sound would be due to the changing video content. Ed It sounds like the RX was not tuned to me...; /archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00058.html (10,793 bytes)
186. Re: [RFI] Sungevity Solar RFI (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 20:07:50 +0000; Are there any solar inverters out there right now that ARE very noisy? I am not talking interference within one's own house, but strong interference from neighboring homes. I'd like to buy one and te; /archives//html/RFI/2014-05/msg00014.html (8,092 bytes)
187. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:56:46 +0000; The FCC has not tested equipment for authorization in over 40 years. There are 3 main levels of authorization for equipment: 1. Certification. The manufacturer submits test data to the FCC and it or; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00040.html (9,585 bytes)
188. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 18:50:34 +0000; The FCC has already outsourced certification to the TCBs, Peter. Can you elaborate a bit more on what additional outsourcing you think is possible? Ed, W1RFI Deregulation is a fine thing, isn't it? W; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00045.html (9,859 bytes)
189. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 19:24:35 +0000; The two exceptions have been some of the battery chargers and power supplies imported from various countries and, of course, the grow lights ARRL recently tested. FCC does do some spot checking, but; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00047.html (10,104 bytes)
190. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 19:54:20 +0000; Hi, Dale, I have seen issues with many of the certification reports approved by the TCBs, but most are not really impacting the EMC performance of the product, so are generally "harmless." The certif; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00049.html (13,359 bytes)
191. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:26:06 +0000; Let me offer a few quick points, in between meetings. If you tell a neighbor that YOUR RFI problem is solved, but that you can't speak for other frequencies such as police, fire, etc., I can't imagin; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00081.html (16,199 bytes)
192. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:30:57 +0000; ALL of the lights we have tested have been way above the limits. All are subject to formal complaint. One FCC Citation was issued to a grower on the west coast. I also have heard that the FCC Lab is; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00082.html (17,566 bytes)
193. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 18:31:14 +0000; The marijuana growers are very concerned that their operation emits a clearly identifiable noise signature. During the growing season, they use a 16 hour on cycle, changing to 12 hours as the crop is; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00092.html (12,545 bytes)
194. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 18:49:14 +0000; Most states or provinces probably have similar laws about disclosing major defects. The marijuana growers are very concerned that their operation emits a clearly identifiable noise signature. During; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00094.html (9,372 bytes)
195. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 15:24:56 +0000; The risk to this approach is that if you the big tower in the neighborhood, the grower will probably put two and two together if it comes out that the probable cause to execute the warrant was the pr; /archives//html/RFI/2014-08/msg00002.html (11,897 bytes)
196. Re: [RFI] Noise on 3513.5 (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 22:49:39 +0000; I wouldn't spend a lot of time trying to locate the source in my neighborhood until I had hit the main breaker in my house. It is just much easier to do that, even with a minor inconvenience, than it; /archives//html/RFI/2014-09/msg00015.html (10,477 bytes)
197. Re: [RFI] 160 meters RFI caused by low voltage bookcase lights (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:43:01 +0000; ARRL has very few reports of these things that have specific model numbers, so yes, please, send the information on any that cause interference to rfi@arrl.org. The rules require the following: 1. Th; /archives//html/RFI/2014-09/msg00079.html (12,475 bytes)
198. Re: [RFI] 160 meters RFI caused by low voltage bookcase lights (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:44:21 +0000; At those levels, there is little doubt in my mind that this exceeds the FCC limits for emissions. Let me know what model number this is and we can get one and test it. Ed, W1RFI Late last week I enco; /archives//html/RFI/2014-09/msg00080.html (8,828 bytes)
199. Re: [RFI] RFI Success (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:02:09 +0000; A great lesson, Tom, and thanks for sharing it. Do you have the model number of the offending device? I'd like to get one and test it to see if it meets or exceeds the FCC conducted noise limits. Ed,; /archives//html/RFI/2015-01/msg00157.html (9,183 bytes)
200. Re: [RFI] RFI Success (score: 1): Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:58:44 +0000; Thanks. That's an easy one and we don't need to do any testing. But if we do know of devices that generate more than S9 noise from a house next door, the Lab wants to get reports because we can test; /archives//html/RFI/2015-01/msg00164.html (10,365 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]