Mail Archive Search: <+from:n4zr@contesting.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:n4zr@contesting.com: 336 ]

Total 336 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [RFI] Response to news FCC okays BPL proposal (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:22:53 -0500; At 12:04 PM 2/13/04 -0800, Cortland Richmond wrote: Before folks get into the griping and plotting (too late!) mode, I'd like to say this is not a defeat. The NOI was about whether the FCC should inc; /archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00085.html (9,005 bytes)
122. Re: [RFI] Response to news FCC okays BPL proposal (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:00:08 -0500; At 04:12 PM 2/13/04 -0500, CliffHazen@aol.com wrote: I've heard comments inside the electrical power industry on BPL that there is expectation that many amateur radio operators will not complain beca; /archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00089.html (9,461 bytes)
123. [RFI] Local Noise Environment (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:13:20 -0500; I am trying to figure out my local noise environment and understand what (if anything) I can do to correct it. On my shunt-fed tower, in daytime, the S-meter on my Mark V (which is extremely generous; /archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00092.html (7,333 bytes)
124. [RFI] Local noise (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:54:50 -0500; At the suggestion of a number of people, I have put a 30-second MP3 recording of my noise on my web site at www.qsl.net/n4zr/160noise.mp3. I'd appreciate it if anyone who has time (and maybe an oscil; /archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00093.html (6,608 bytes)
125. [RFI] Local noise environment (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 08:56:50 -0500; A bunch of responses, that I thought would be worth summarizing briefly. Nobody thought that this sort of interference *level* (S9+10) is to be expected. Several people put the noise on waterfall dis; /archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00101.html (9,295 bytes)
126. Re: [RFI] W8WWV noise (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 07:36:57 -0500; At 10:36 PM 2/16/04 -0600, W0UN -- John Brosnahan wrote: Greg, W8WWV asked me about his noise problem and I am checking on some radar and sounding systems to see if anything is out there that might m; /archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00112.html (10,780 bytes)
127. Re: [RFI] W8WWV noise (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:32:32 -0500; At 11:54 AM 2/17/04 -0800, Bob Tellefsen wrote: Pete You said one was a silent wall switch. Could it have been a mercury switch? Not sure how that would couse the RFI you describe, but they are used; /archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00114.html (8,653 bytes)
128. Re: [RFI] BPL--FCC Proposed Rules//We Need to Respond (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 15:43:25 -0500; At 12:32 PM 3/5/04 -0800, N6KJ wrote: The BPL proponents continue to insist that power lines will not radiate like an antenna and that their equipment appears as a "point-source" radiator. If that's; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00013.html (8,287 bytes)
129. Re: [RFI] TVI (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 17:07:37 -0500; At 04:22 PM 3/6/04 -0500, Tom Rauch wrote: By far the most effective cure would be installing an outlet strip with built in lightning protection for cable and electrical at each TV, and running the c; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00028.html (7,234 bytes)
130. Re: [RFI] RE: Quiet Shack PC Systems? (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:43:38 -0500; A couple of comments interspersed in this excellent message At 02:20 PM 3/18/04, kz8e@wt.net wrote: Deni, There is no cut and dried way to eliminate all the interference. It would even be incorrect t; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00081.html (9,503 bytes)
131. [RFI] Halogen undercabinet lights (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 16:46:42 -0500; For those confronting potential RFI from the common low-voltage versions of these things that have "electronic transformers" -- presumably some sort of switching supply -- there is another alternativ; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00006.html (6,934 bytes)
132. [RFI] 120v halogen lights (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 13:57:14 -0500; I spoke too soon -- the 120 volt halogens are quiet, all right, but they also don't put out enough light to function as task lighting -- much less than the low voltage lights do. So it's back to the; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00007.html (6,896 bytes)
133. Re: [RFI] 120v halogen lights (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 09:35:33 -0400; At 09:08 AM 4/4/04, Jim wrote: Neighbor uses something he calls "puck lights" for his bar area. under the cabinets in the back bar and in the front bar too. He spaces them 18 to 24 inches apart. I do; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00010.html (8,010 bytes)
134. Re: [RFI] 120v halogen lights (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 10:15:22 -0400; the 24 and search I have some LV "puck lights" in my shack and had to throw away the "transformers" because of RFI and use real LV transformers. I assume that there is no reason why any real transfor; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00012.html (8,412 bytes)
135. Re: [RFI] 120v halogen lights (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 07:37:55 -0400; At 09:40 PM 4/4/04, Cortland Richmond wrote: Here's something interesting: "Question: What happens if the load is below the rated power range? Answer: An instable operation can occur if the load on t; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00018.html (9,240 bytes)
136. Re: [RFI] PLCA Response to WSJ Article (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 14:00:51 -0400; What gibberish. On the other hand, may their public arrogance come back to haynt them when Part 15 is invoked to force them to shut down their service, or when we shut it down with our "on demand" si; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00036.html (6,776 bytes)
137. Re: [RFI] Help RFI to keypad on stove (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 08:27:40 -0400; At 12:30 AM 4/17/04, Fjx1@aol.com wrote: Anyone have source for good plug in EMI filters? Radio shack has a filter that sells for $15 or so, and which they spec at 30 dB attenuation in the HF range.; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00058.html (7,172 bytes)
138. Re: [RFI] Investment vs. interference: BPL (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 13:43:18 -0400; At 11:52 AM 4/17/04, Jim Jarvis wrote: This past week, Verizon announced intention to roll out DSL service to unserved areas...expecting the whole country to be covered by 2006. BPL is too cumbersome; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00065.html (7,934 bytes)
139. RE: [RFI] source for AC line filters and ferrites? (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 07:06:04 -0400; http://www.arraysolutions.com/Products/nqnaclinefilter.htm Not exactly cheap, but anything W3NQN makes is top notch. For a cheap solution (?), I think Radio Shack still makes their $15 line filter th; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00112.html (8,047 bytes)
140. Re: [RFI] Wasted and Useful Bandwidth (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 11:43:33 -0400; At 11:25 AM 5/2/04, Bill Turner wrote, in response to Ward Silver: ... I'm sure there are other examples but if the average guy like me can't think of them, they can't be much. Earlier I had written; /archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00015.html (9,012 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]