Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Turner: 139 ]

Total 139 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [RFI] Protecting our frequencies (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:14:34 -0700
That's one area where we part company, Jim. The ability to "work DX 24/7" is not confined to ham radio; existing commercial satellite technology already does that via radio and the internet does it v
/archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00134.html (8,513 bytes)

62. Re: [RFI] Wasted and Useful Bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:28:07 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Those things are all great fun to tinker with and use, but I doubt if any of them were pioneered by hams. As far as I know, the military and
/archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00135.html (8,248 bytes)

63. Re: [RFI] Protecting our frequencies (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 07:14:51 -0700
One huge difference is our HF bands have little or no commercial value, just the opposite of the UHF/SHF bands. Unlike many sky-is-falling hams, I see BPL as a non-issue for two reasons: 1. FCC rules
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00000.html (7,276 bytes)

64. Re: [RFI] Wasted and Useful Bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 07:21:49 -0700
_________________________________________________________ I'm trying to think of a new idea or material that has come out of auto racing. The only one that comes to mind is those ridiculous spoilers
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00001.html (7,242 bytes)

65. Re: [RFI] Protecting our frequencies (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 08:15:09 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Non-smoker here. Ed, do you understand the difference between a frequency assigned for TRANSMITTING and one assigned to be used over wires? M
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00010.html (7,928 bytes)

66. Re: [RFI] Wasted and Useful Bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 08:17:38 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Helps the wife while cornering into the day care center, I'm sure. :-) -- Bill, W6WRT QSLs via LoTW _________________________________________
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00011.html (8,793 bytes)

67. Re: [RFI] Wasted and Useful Bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 08:25:22 -0700
Some people use synthetic in the family sedan, but not many judging by what I see in the shopping carts at WalMart. I could be wrong. Ok, if you say so. Gimme cast iron, anytime. Too many horror stor
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00012.html (9,228 bytes)

68. Re: [RFI] Wasted and Useful Bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 08:28:38 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Me too. I love that kind of stuff. Just wish it was still happening. -- Bill, W6WRT QSLs via LoTW ___________________________________________
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00013.html (8,391 bytes)

69. Re: [RFI] Wasted and Useful Bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 08:36:22 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Ok, but I have to admit being prejudiced against auto racing due to the disgraceful incident many years ago when a turbine engine car almost
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00014.html (9,054 bytes)

70. Re: [RFI] Wasted and Useful Bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 11:27:31 -0700
(list of 11 improvements fostered by auto racing) _________________________________________________________ Ok, sounds good, but like I said, I never heard of any of them except the individual coil p
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00018.html (9,332 bytes)

71. Re: [RFI] Wasted and Useful Bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 13:00:28 -0700
_________________________________________________________ I wasn't speaking about economy. If overall economy is your desire, a used four-banger is your cheapest ride. The context of the conversation
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00020.html (8,785 bytes)

72. Re: [RFI] Wasted and Useful Bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 08:01:29 -0700
_________________________________________________________ I agree with nearly all your observations Michael, but I take issue with the one above. You're right to be negative about hydrogen *IF* we us
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00024.html (9,708 bytes)

73. Re: [RFI] Wasted and Useful Bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 07:55:18 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Agreed, that's why we're still burning fossil fuels. Solar/hydrogen technology is doable, just not cheap. My question is, do we want to wait
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00046.html (9,723 bytes)

74. Re: [RFI] Wasted and Useful Bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 08:48:30 -0700
_________________________________________________________ When I was in college in 1960 I wrote a treatise on the world's diminishing resources. Back then, there were enough known oil reserves to las
/archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00050.html (9,947 bytes)

75. Re: [RFI] Honda Generator RFI? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Turner" <n2scj@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 20:44:38 -0400
What bands did you operate on Field Day with the Eu1000i generators? Bob if any major RFI problems with a Mitsubishi 600/900w inverter-generator and have been having all sorts of the same RFI problem
/archives//html/RFI/2006-09/msg00007.html (9,623 bytes)

76. Re: [RFI] Home networking birdies (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Turner" <n2scj@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:15:51 -0400
Try laying aluminum foil on top of hub. That minimized problem for me years ago for vhf contests. I also moved hub from 2nd story shack to my basement. Roof tower used here. I tried to keep hub direc
/archives//html/RFI/2006-09/msg00017.html (8,210 bytes)

77. Re: [RFI] Weather Station on 433.92? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Turner" <n2scj@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 17:16:13 -0500
I'm fairly certain they are legal. Low power is one of the reasons. I forget the details. Bob Roger, I believe these units full under the ISM frequency band classification, but I could be wrong. But
/archives//html/RFI/2007-02/msg00004.html (9,352 bytes)

78. Re: [RFI] Very nasty noise (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Turner" <n2scj@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 19:07:00 -0400
Except 255? Maybe 90 degrees off that? IE: it's nulled on the side of your beam? Bob Just yesterday (March 17) a new and very nasty noise appeared on my radio. It covers all bands from AM broadcast t
/archives//html/RFI/2007-04/msg00000.html (7,792 bytes)

79. Re: [RFI] Why is this interference any different than BPL (score: 1)
Author: "Turner, Bob" <n2scj@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:12:34 -0400
A few days later Microsoft responded that the device under question was defective. Bob Saw this from my Google alerts. If they turned down this, which is in a specific frequency band then how is BPL
/archives//html/RFI/2007-08/msg00050.html (9,096 bytes)

80. Re: [RFI] VDSL (score: 1)
Author: "Turner, Bob" <n2scj@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:19:39 -0400
If I recall correctly. DSL = Digital Subscriber Line. Assumed to be SDSL below. SDSL = Synchronous Digital Subscriber line. Same upload and download speed. ADSL = Asynchronous Digital Subscriber line
/archives//html/RFI/2007-08/msg00051.html (9,459 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
This search system is powered by Namazu