Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Turner: 139 ]

Total 139 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [RFI] Fishtank Lighting RFI on 3.8 and 1.8Mhz (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 17:40:58 -0800
_________________________________________________________ Put the lights on a timer so they're on when you're not on the air. -- Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RFI mailin
/archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00053.html (7,473 bytes)

42. [RFI] Re: [TowerTalk] electric fence qrn (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 20:57:29 -0800
On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 22:12:54 -0600, Tim Duffy K3LR <k3lr@k3lr.com> wrote: _________________________________________________________ Mine is a Fi-Shock model SS-725. http://www.fishock.com/ The SS-725
/archives//html/RFI/2003-12/msg00025.html (7,435 bytes)

43. Re: [RFI] Re: [TowerTalk] electric fence qrn (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 07:18:20 -0800
_________________________________________________________ My Fi-Shock is also marked "continuous current", although it's really continuous voltage. Anyway, that's what to look for. -- Bill, W6WRT ___
/archives//html/RFI/2003-12/msg00027.html (8,212 bytes)

44. Re: [RFI] Weird RFI question for the group (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:03:55 -0800
____________________ Sounds like a switching power supply. Those little devils are being used everywhere nowadays. I had a neighbor with one in a golf cart battery charger that drove me nuts till I f
/archives//html/RFI/2003-12/msg00042.html (7,286 bytes)

45. Re: [RFI] Proposed Cable test (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 10:29:27 -0800
____________________ Your wife lets you do this? -- Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
/archives//html/RFI/2003-12/msg00090.html (6,837 bytes)

46. Re: [RFI] Can you identify this noise? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:49:54 -0800
_________________________________________________________ The pulsing on and off is a little unusual, but the basic noise sounds like ordinary power line arcing. Some direction finding is in order. -
/archives//html/RFI/2004-01/msg00033.html (7,531 bytes)

47. Re: [RFI] CQ-BPL (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:31:26 -0800
_________________________________________________________ No. Our signal would probably be many times stronger than theirs. Their signal could be barely audible while ours could be overwhelming. Give
/archives//html/RFI/2004-01/msg00063.html (7,479 bytes)

48. Re: [RFI] CQ-BPL (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:10:29 -0800
_________________________________________________________ I love humor as much as the next guy. I did spot a couple of feeble attempts there, but you will please note that at least two other people t
/archives//html/RFI/2004-01/msg00067.html (7,622 bytes)

49. Re: [RFI] KW Amp on second floor (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:07:26 -0800
_________________________________________________________ What kind of ground are you concerned about: Antenna, safety or lightning? -- Bill, W6WRT QSLs via LoTW _____________________________________
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00060.html (7,245 bytes)

50. Re: [RFI] Today's Wall Stree Journal front page article on hams & BPL (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:17:29 -0800
_________________________________________________________ Like the blind men and the elephant, we all have our different perceptions, but I thought the article was quite fair and correct. For nearly
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00093.html (11,003 bytes)

51. Re: [RFI] WSJ & BPL (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:35:37 -0800
_________________________________________________________ I believe Dave has pointed out the best answer to the BPL problem: Wireless. The sooner the better. -- Bill, W6WRT QSLs via LoTW ____________
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00101.html (7,539 bytes)

52. Re: [RFI] Today's Wall Stree Journal front page article on hams & BPL (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 17:57:49 -0800
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:51:16 -0600, <dgsvetan@rockwellcollins.com> wrote: _________________________________________________________ I am at a loss for an answer. To me and nearly all other hams, it i
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00110.html (8,792 bytes)

53. Re: [RFI] Today's Wall Stree Journal front page article on hams & BPL (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 18:39:21 -0800
_________________________________________________________ Really? Private pilots would be surprised to hear that. -- Bill W6WRT QSLs via LoTW _______________________________________________ RFI maili
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00112.html (8,359 bytes)

54. Re: [RFI] Today's Wall Stree Journal front page article on hams & BPL (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:08:32 -0800
_________________________________________________________ On what frequency(s)? A single carrier or broadband white noise wiping out everything? Have you (Ed) heard BPL yourself from a mobile? I'm as
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00129.html (9,445 bytes)

55. Re: [RFI] Bush and BPL (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 07:08:55 -0800
_________________________________________________________ That technology isn't quite dead yet. There is something called WiMAX on the horizon. Check this out: http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/ar
/archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00141.html (7,950 bytes)

56. Re: [RFI] BPL a major topic at Upcoming UTC Annual Meeting (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 17:35:52 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Even if it is "legal", I wish this jammer mentality would disappear. If we hams get into a pissing contest with the BPL folks, we will lose,
/archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00047.html (7,703 bytes)

57. Re: [RFI] BPL a major topic at Upcoming UTC Annual Meeting (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 22:47:39 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Of course it does. The original post said nothing at all about a coordinated demonstration of interference, it just said fire up the kw rigs,
/archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00051.html (8,145 bytes)

58. Re: [RFI] BPL (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 13:35:48 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Nonsense. One can operate perfectly legally with the full intention of causing deliberate interference. It's the INTENT we're talking about,
/archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00071.html (7,764 bytes)

59. Re: [RFI] What's up at 5Gig? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 08:10:29 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Just like the internet only more expensive. Yawn. -- Bill, W6WRT QSLs via LoTW _______________________________________________ RFI mailing li
/archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00084.html (7,160 bytes)

60. Re: [RFI] Protecting our frequencies (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 08:56:31 -0700
_________________________________________________________ I would gladly trade all of our UHF/SHF bands for a broadcast-free 40 meters. The future of ham radio is HF. Amateur satellites are a huge wa
/archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00131.html (8,384 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
This search system is powered by Namazu