- 1. [Propagation] 160m Propagation Prediction (score: 1)
- Author: "NW7US, Tomas" <nw7us@hfradio.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:32:28 -0700
- On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 15:35:16 -0400, Jeff Maass <jmaass@columbus.rr.com> wrote: How does the MUF map predict availablity of a DX path for 80 Meter QSOs (which was the original question), or for 160 Me
- /archives//html/Propagation/2004-09/msg00038.html (9,835 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Propagation] 160m Propagation Prediction (score: 1)
- Author: Crawford MacKeand <jcbmck@UDel.Edu>
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 17:11:13 -0400 (EDT)
- Tomas has stirred me up here to take look at the "mfsignal" subroutine I wrote for SnapMAX & I've finally gotten round to looking to see what were the references that I used for the MF algorithms. Th
- /archives//html/Propagation/2004-10/msg00021.html (8,735 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu