Mail Archive Search: <+from:jcbmck@UDel.Edu>

Results:

References: [ +from:jcbmck@UDel.Edu: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Propagation] 160m Propagation Prediction (score: 1): Author: Crawford MacKeand <jcbmck@UDel.Edu>; Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 17:11:13 -0400 (EDT); Tomas has stirred me up here to take look at the "mfsignal" subroutine I wrote for SnapMAX & I've finally gotten round to looking to see what were the references that I used for the MF algorithms. Th; /archives//html/Propagation/2004-10/msg00021.html (8,735 bytes)
2. Re: [Propagation] 160 m maybe, but NOT SnapMAX ..... (score: 1): Author: Crawford MacKeand <jcbmck@UDel.Edu>; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 21:08:54 -0400 (EDT); Hi Carl, I'm afraid SnapMAX is just no help at all on that one. The IFRB etc. data gives me no basis in there for extrapolation. It's an empirical approach in which the data is all from the non-inter; /archives//html/Propagation/2004-10/msg00025.html (8,229 bytes)
3. [Propagation] Propagation Wave Angle Calculator (score: 1): Author: Crawford MacKeand <jcbmck@UDel.Edu>; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 20:48:42 -0500 (EST); You might like to give SNAPmax a try. It is freeware, available for download from Simtel and a few other sites, and does all those things. I find it easy to use, but then I wrote it. <grin> Make sur; /archives//html/Propagation/2004-11/msg00041.html (7,539 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]