- 1. [Orion] Re: [TenTec] Topband: BDR redux (score: 1)
- Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:24:22 -0600
- I think you totally misunderstand AGC THRESHOLD as applied in the Orion. The RF gain control in the less modern receivers you refer to does much more than simply change, as a byproduct, AGC threshol
- /archives//html/Orion/2004-02/msg00006.html (7,715 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Orion] Re: [TenTec] Topband: BDR redux (score: 1)
- Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 18:41:06 -0500
- This is true. It's certainly better to have a separate AGC threshold, as in Orion. Unfortunately, AGC Threshold control on Orion is an ergonomic disaster. It should have had a knob assigned to itself
- /archives//html/Orion/2004-02/msg00008.html (7,526 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Orion] Re: [TenTec] Topband: BDR redux (score: 1)
- Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 17:52:59 -0600
- The crash of the Hindenburg was a disaster. The threshold control can be set up to be one button push away ... Not sure I understand why adjusting THRESHOLD should have any impact on S-Meter indicat
- /archives//html/Orion/2004-02/msg00009.html (7,676 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Orion] Re: [TenTec] Topband: BDR redux (score: 1)
- Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 19:26:57 -0500
- That's exactly too much for me :-) I'm not sure either, just a though that it's position should be indicated in relation to signal levels presented on the S meter. Those 5-digit microvolts (with ~1 d
- /archives//html/Orion/2004-02/msg00010.html (7,475 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu