Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Orion\]\s+ORION\s+PERFORMANCE\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Orion\]\s+ORION\s+PERFORMANCE\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Orion] ORION PERFORMANCE (score: 1): Author: PY5EG <py5eg@iesa.com.br>; Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 12:12:00 -0200; Hi friends: I have my Orion with all the filters for more than 5 months now and comparing the rig with my MARK V , I'm disappointed with the Orion's performance. I'm using Tarsus's Xcvrs most of the; /archives//html/Orion/2004-11/msg00006.html (8,628 bytes)
2. RE: [Orion] ORION PERFORMANCE (score: 1): Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 09:22:37 -0600; Hi Friends! Wow!, I wish I could work py5eg station for a few weeks, I could complete 5BDXCC in just a few hours with that antenna system. I'd like to share my experience with the Orion, It is a diff; /archives//html/Orion/2004-11/msg00007.html (11,632 bytes)
3. Re: [Orion] ORION PERFORMANCE (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 13:37:06 -0500; Hi Oms, Some CQ WW SSB experiences of other Orion owners: K3ZO (2004 CQ WW SSB): On the other hand, Murphy left operating conditions alone, and there was absolutely no line noise on any band until ab; /archives//html/Orion/2004-11/msg00008.html (10,816 bytes)
4. RE: [Orion] ORION PERFORMANCE (score: 1): Author: Eric Scace K3NA <eric@k3na.org>; Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 14:56:23 -0500; Hello Oms -- I share Bill W4ZV's opinion that your troubles with the Orion were probably due to sub-optimal receiver settings. At the multi-op station where I was working this past weekend, I relieve; /archives//html/Orion/2004-11/msg00010.html (8,175 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]