Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Orion\]\s+O2\s+versus\s+Orion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Orion\]\s+O2\s+versus\s+Orion\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Orion] O2 versus Orion (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 09:40:09 -0500; Only you can decide if the II is worth the ~$1700 difference (no tuner) between a used Orion and a new O2. Ten-Tec's words follow with my **comments**: ** What is new about the ORION II ? Super brig; /archives//html/Orion/2006-01/msg00014.html (9,966 bytes)
2. Re: [Orion] O2 versus Orion (score: 1): Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:13:15 -0500; Does anyone understand this point? I used to think all the Orion (1) frequencies were derived from the TCXO. I've had reasonable luck tweaking the oscillator for better accuracy, as have others. I ty; /archives//html/Orion/2006-01/msg00015.html (8,084 bytes)
3. Re: [Orion] O2 versus Orion (score: 1): Author: bob finger <finger@goeaston.net>; Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:09:45 -0500; "Zero beating" by ear is not going to get you any closer. Beside you are not zero beating but matching tones. Zero beating is another concept entirely. I use my Orion to chase dx, not measure frequen; /archives//html/Orion/2006-01/msg00016.html (8,014 bytes)
4. Re: [Orion] O2 versus Orion (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:12:28 -0500; Zero or not, it is the same concept of beating and frequences can be compared to well below 1 Hz that way. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA _______________________________________________ Orion mailing list O; /archives//html/Orion/2006-01/msg00017.html (6,900 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]