Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Orion\]\s+New\s+Orion\s+II\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [Orion] New Orion II (score: 1)
Author: "W0YG, Charlie Summers" <w0yg@myawai.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:00:04 -0000
Hello to the List! I just noticed on the TenTec web site the announcement of a new Orion II. Most notable is the color TFT display as well as filters specifically made for this new Orion II. Folks mi
/archives//html/Orion/2005-07/msg00014.html (6,543 bytes)

2. Re: [Orion] New Orion II (score: 1)
Author: Tim Randa <tranda@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 20:12:42 -0500
Sure sounds like what most people said they should of put out with their first version. Glad I'm not stuck with one of the Orion I's Just wonder how long it'll take to get all the bugs out of their n
/archives//html/Orion/2005-07/msg00015.html (6,823 bytes)

3. Re: [Orion] New Orion II (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 21:47:15 -0400
"stuck with" doesn't really apply. The I is a great radio. Instead of being happy, you should really be sorry that you've been missing out :-) Grant/NQ5T ____________________________________________
/archives//html/Orion/2005-07/msg00016.html (6,781 bytes)

4. Re: [Orion] New Orion II (score: 1)
Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 21:59:26 -0400
The Orion being a great radio is your opinion. In my opinion a 'great' radio works as the manufacture claims it will work and in this case, the Orion was NOT a great radio. :-) Tommy - W4BQF ________
/archives//html/Orion/2005-07/msg00018.html (8,012 bytes)

5. Re: [Orion] New Orion II (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 22:02:33 -0400
Obsolescence and pricing This happens with every computer or automobile you ever bought. Why should it be different with radios? We should be happy that the technology is moving forward, even if it's
/archives//html/Orion/2005-07/msg00019.html (8,202 bytes)

6. Re: [Orion] New Orion II (score: 1)
Author: "W0YG, Charlie Summers" <w0yg@myawai.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:31:04 -0000
I suspect the filter capability in the Orion II will be upgraded over the Orion I or original Orion. By this I mean the degradation with the currect 500Hz and 250Hz specs, in terms of DR, will be enh
/archives//html/Orion/2005-07/msg00020.html (7,470 bytes)

7. Re: [Orion] New Orion II (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:39:06 -0400
Yes, it is, in my 46 years of ham radio and engineering opinion. We ALL know it isn't yours, because we've had to endure the endless grumbling. Just keep on beating that old and tired drum ... Grant/
/archives//html/Orion/2005-07/msg00021.html (7,456 bytes)

8. Re: [Orion] New Orion II (score: 1)
Author: "w5apn" <w5apn@swbell.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 07:18:53 -0600
Hi Grant. I have had my Orion for almost 2 years and its operation has been flawless, including with the latest FW upgrade. And TT has always been great to deal with. In my opinion we are talking abo
/archives//html/Orion/2005-07/msg00022.html (8,535 bytes)

9. Re: [Orion] New Orion II (score: 1)
Author: HeathlinerSB@aol.com
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:27:10 EDT
Sounds like a fine devellopment, the ORION II. But it seems, that one could think, TT does the same mistakes than other manufacturerrs: I bought an IV 756 ProII for a quite high price, when it was ju
/archives//html/Orion/2005-07/msg00025.html (7,828 bytes)

10. Re: [Orion] New Orion II (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:51:18 +0000
I'm just not getting the instant devaluation of the Orion. The O2 version is $700 MORE expensive and its introduction apparently guarantees several additional years of continued support for the O1 fi
/archives//html/Orion/2005-07/msg00026.html (8,293 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu