Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[na\-user\]\s+NA\s+vs\s+CT\s+using\s+OMNI\s+6\+\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[na\-user\]\s+NA\s+vs\s+CT\s+using\s+OMNI\s+6\+\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [na-user] NA vs CT using OMNI 6+ (score: 1): Author: 00tlzivney@bsuvc.bsu.edu (00tlzivney@bsuvc.bsu.edu); Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 14:57:54 -0500 (EST); I have had a lot of little nagging problems getting CT9.45 and other versions to do what I want. First, let me say that CT works fine with the OMNI 6+. No gripes whatsoever. However, I am having diff; /archives//html/NA-User/2000-05/msg00015.html (9,077 bytes)
2. [na-user] NA vs CT using OMNI 6+ (score: 1): Author: Ken Adams <k5ka@ionet.net> (Ken Adams); Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 18:14:37 -0500; Not that I know of, but if you build one according to Dave's schematic in the back of the manual it works fine. The look and feel is very similar. Try http://datom.contesting.com/ I have read some o; /archives//html/NA-User/2000-05/msg00016.html (7,889 bytes)
3. [na-user] NA vs CT using OMNI 6+ (score: 1): Author: Larry Crim" <k4ab@email.msn.com (Larry Crim); Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 19:44:48 -0500; Speaking of that, Dave...do you have any of your new circuit boards available for sale? -Larry K4AB -- Submissions: na-user@contesting.com Administrative requests: na-user-REQUEST@contesting.com WWW; /archives//html/NA-User/2000-05/msg00017.html (8,946 bytes)
4. [na-user] NA vs CT using OMNI 6+ (score: 1): Author: k8cc <k8cc@mediaone.net> (k8cc); Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 23:43:31 -0400; Terry, To answer your questions: NA was originally *very* similar to CT. The original intent of NA was to support domestic contests (that's where the name came from) using the CT-style interface. If; /archives//html/NA-User/2000-05/msg00018.html (9,803 bytes)
5. [na-user] NA vs CT using OMNI 6+ (score: 1): Author: Jonesy KC9TV" <kc9tv@qsl.net (Jonesy KC9TV); Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 17:41:14 -0500; I have a OMNI 6 which NA works great with no problems kudos Dave Tnx! KC9TV Jonesy -- Original Message -- From: <00tlzivney@bsuvc.bsu.edu> To: <na-user@contesting.com>; <cq-contest@contesting.com>; <; /archives//html/NA-User/2000-05/msg00020.html (10,305 bytes)
6. [na-user] NA vs CT using OMNI 6+ (score: 1): Author: 00tlzivney@bsuvc.bsu.edu (00tlzivney@bsuvc.bsu.edu); Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 10:38:32 -0500 (EST); Return-path: <k8cc@mediaone.net> Received: from demai05.mw.mediaone.net ([24.131.1.56]) by BSUVC.bsu.edu (PMDF V5.2-31 #35953) with SMTP id <01JPFU3E39K291WMTY@BSUVC.bsu.edu> for 00tlzivney@BSUVC.bsu; /archives//html/NA-User/2000-05/msg00021.html (10,929 bytes)
7. [na-user] NA vs CT using OMNI 6+ (score: 1): Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com); Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 13:46:57 EDT; Dave and others, I have successfully used NA with my two Omni 6's (both with plus features). I am using a switch box patterned after the one in the NA book and it works great. The interesting part of; /archives//html/NA-User/2000-05/msg00022.html (8,755 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]