Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+SOHO\s+vs\.\s+Sat\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+SOHO\s+vs\.\s+Sat\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Karlnet] SOHO vs. Sat (score: 1): Author: "John Benson" <john@mwutah.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 19:01:19 -0700; I am installing Camera behind a wireless link and linking it back to an existing network where it will go out a T1 line. Camera --> #1 SOHO RG --> #2 SOHO or Sat RG --> Wired Network, camera traffic; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-12/msg00224.html (8,958 bytes)
2. RE: [Karlnet] SOHO vs. Sat (score: 1): Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 03:47:27 -0600; will any computers on the wired network be looking into the camera? going w/ a SAT is a safer way to go, as you completely avoid the possibility of reaching your 5 user limit (on the Ethernet MAC ta; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-12/msg00225.html (9,089 bytes)
3. RE: [Karlnet] SOHO vs. Sat (score: 1): Author: "John Benson" <john@mwutah.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:03:57 -0700; So what you are saying (correct me if I am wrong) is that the SOHO base RG will only register one of the mac addresses on the wired network side if a computer or device on the wired side tries to sen; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-12/msg00228.html (10,047 bytes)
4. RE: [Karlnet] SOHO vs. Sat (score: 1): Author: "tony list" <tonylist@wwwbiz.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 03:21:07 -0500; John This will work but you need to have router on the wired side if there will be more then 5 MAC. For example you do not want SOHO 2 plugged into a switch as it will only take the first 5 MAC assoc; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-12/msg00229.html (9,966 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]