Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+KN\-50\s+and\s+802\.11\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+KN\-50\s+and\s+802\.11\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1): Author: "Marcelo Gimenez" <marcelo@aeronetworks.com.br>; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 18:10:21 -0300; Hi, Please, how can i configure KN-50 to works in 802.11 ( no Turbocell)? Thanks, Marcelo Gimenez AERO NETWORKS LTDA (+55 67) 326-9494 / 8111-8006 http://www.aeronetworks.com.br _____________________; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00031.html (8,258 bytes)
2. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1): Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:38:40 -0800; I have some v1.00-00-052215 KN-50's and I want to upgrade them to v.1.00-00.073017. Anyone know how this is done? Norm _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WIS; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00032.html (9,230 bytes)
3. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1): Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:17:09 -0800; Also curious as to when we'll see some support for a and g standards? I could really use an upgrade in the backhaul, and I'd just as soon stay with what I know. Norm _________________________________; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00033.html (10,303 bytes)
4. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1): Author: <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:29:33 -0500; Amen to that. I would really love to see a karlnet compatible radio that's boast more than a 5 mbs transfer capability. I have looked at alternatives like Mikrotick and such but really want to keep m; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00034.html (11,300 bytes)
5. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1): Author: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:39:40 -0500; Amen to that!! just I Turbocell)? _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00035.html (12,457 bytes)
6. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1): Author: Michael McDermott <michael@veritech.com.au>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:54:26 +1100; What did you think about the Mikrotick g backhaul soultion? At 08:39 PM 10/12/2003 -0500, you wrote: Amen to that!! -- Original Message -- From: <jna@tcpbbs.net> To: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroa; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00036.html (12,849 bytes)
7. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1): Author: <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 00:05:21 -0500; I have considered it and am really going to try and keep all Karlnet. I know the 802 will be outgrown faster than I would like. I just need to get more bandwidth to my backhauls. that's alternatives; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00037.html (14,526 bytes)
8. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1): Author: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 00:24:37 -0500; We are keeping Karlnet for ap's and going to Trango for backhaul...I would really rather have all Karlnet, though. know network backhaul. to _______________________________________________ Karlnet ma; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00038.html (16,028 bytes)
9. RE: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1): Author: "wbos" <wbos@lumiad.nl>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:15:55 +0100; Before everybody jumps to this. We have a network in the Netherlands and implemented a g backhaul + an a backhaul solutions. We have set up 5 5ghz links now and really got frustrated on this frequenc; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00046.html (16,503 bytes)
10. RE: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1): Author: "Caleb Carroll" <karlnet@pathcom.ca>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:41:30 -0700; Wim, Welcome to the wonderful world of unlicensed spectrum! ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-12/msg00048.html (11,898 bytes)
11. [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1): Author: "Marcelo Gimenez" <marcelo@aeronetworks.com.br>; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 18:10:21 -0300; Hi, Please, how can i configure KN-50 to works in 802.11 ( no Turbocell)? Thanks, Marcelo Gimenez AERO NETWORKS LTDA (+55 67) 326-9494 / 8111-8006 http://www.aeronetworks.com.br _____________________; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00386.html (8,258 bytes)
12. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1): Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:17:09 -0800; Also curious as to when we'll see some support for a and g standards? I could really use an upgrade in the backhaul, and I'd just as soon stay with what I know. Norm _________________________________; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00388.html (10,323 bytes)
13. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1): Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:38:40 -0800; I have some v1.00-00-052215 KN-50's and I want to upgrade them to v.1.00-00.073017. Anyone know how this is done? Norm _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WIS; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00389.html (9,222 bytes)
14. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1): Author: <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:29:33 -0500; Amen to that. I would really love to see a karlnet compatible radio that's boast more than a 5 mbs transfer capability. I have looked at alternatives like Mikrotick and such but really want to keep m; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00390.html (11,297 bytes)
15. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1): Author: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:39:40 -0500; Amen to that!! just I Turbocell)? _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00391.html (12,452 bytes)
16. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1): Author: Michael McDermott <michael@veritech.com.au>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:54:26 +1100; What did you think about the Mikrotick g backhaul soultion? At 08:39 PM 10/12/2003 -0500, you wrote: Amen to that!! -- Original Message -- From: <jna@tcpbbs.net> To: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroa; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00392.html (12,849 bytes)
17. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1): Author: <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 00:05:21 -0500; I have considered it and am really going to try and keep all Karlnet. I know the 802 will be outgrown faster than I would like. I just need to get more bandwidth to my backhauls. that's alternatives; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00393.html (14,526 bytes)
18. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1): Author: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 00:24:37 -0500; We are keeping Karlnet for ap's and going to Trango for backhaul...I would really rather have all Karlnet, though. know network backhaul. to _______________________________________________ Karlnet ma; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00394.html (16,034 bytes)
19. RE: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1): Author: "wbos" <wbos@lumiad.nl>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:15:55 +0100; Before everybody jumps to this. We have a network in the Netherlands and implemented a g backhaul + an a backhaul solutions. We have set up 5 5ghz links now and really got frustrated on this frequenc; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00403.html (16,513 bytes)
20. RE: [Karlnet] KN-50 and 802.11 (score: 1): Author: "Caleb Carroll" <karlnet@pathcom.ca>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:41:30 -0700; Wim, Welcome to the wonderful world of unlicensed spectrum! ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00404.html (11,898 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]