Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+FCC\s+certs\s+and\s+100\/200mw\s+cards\s+\-\s+possible\s+group\s+effort\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Karlnet] FCC certs and 100/200mw cards - possible group effort? (score: 1)
Author: Dan Metcalf <danm@suncorstainless.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:11:34 -0400
How about we put together a list of possible radio/antenna combos that we want to use and split the costs for fcc certs? Dan Metcalf Wireless Broadband Systems dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com 781-658-2075 w
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00180.html (10,593 bytes)

2. RE: [Karlnet] FCC certs and 100/200mw cards - possible group effort? (score: 1)
Author: "barrywhitcomb" <barrywhitcomb@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:26:50 -0400
We've been testing 2 cards (200 mW) from MikroTik with some Poynting antennas (8 & 13 dpi Patch and 12 dbi Yagi) and have been pleased, so far. Barry Whitcomb --Original Message-- From: karlnet-admin
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00182.html (11,325 bytes)

3. RE: [Karlnet] FCC certs and 100/200mw cards - possible group effort? (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 11:31:02 -0500
I've offered before for antennas that we really don't use, we will split the cost of FCC test lab w/ anyone provided that they handle all the paperwork and filing and etc -Charles --Original Message-
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00183.html (11,269 bytes)

4. Re: [Karlnet] FCC certs and 100/200mw cards - possible group effort? (score: 1)
Author: "admin " <admin@mail.warpspeedinternet.ws>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 09:29:27 -0700
I think Michael is getting ready to do something along these lines. You might check with him. -- Eric L. Johnson WarpSpeed Internet 1-361-563-3742 --
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00187.html (8,831 bytes)

5. Re: [Karlnet] FCC certs and 100/200mw cards - possible group effort? (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <npyoung@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 09:52:02 -0700
Not a bad idea. As has been said before, it would be nice to get a contribution from the antenna manufacturers, as they stand to benefit also from increased sales. But a good idea, instead of waiting
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00190.html (11,887 bytes)

6. RE: [Karlnet] FCC certs and 100/200mw cards - possible group effort? (score: 1)
Author: "Support" <support@karlnet.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 16:26:44 -0400
Karlnet has been thinking about this also. I'd appreciate some feedback on what types of equipment (i.e. antenna types and dB levels, lengths of cable, flat panel, omnis, and sectorized) would be the
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00209.html (10,161 bytes)

7. Re: [Karlnet] FCC certs and 100/200mw cards - possible group effort? (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <npyoung@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 13:46:31 -0700
I'd be interested in the PacWireless 24dB antennas, some high gain panels, and a variety of Superpass sectors with the Orinoco and PRISM II 100/200mW cards. My 2 cents, Norm cable, we
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00212.html (11,241 bytes)

8. RE: [Karlnet] FCC certs and 100/200mw cards - possible group effort? (score: 1)
Author: Dan Metcalf <danm@suncorstainless.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 16:59:23 -0400
I agree with that, you should include the ANDREWS 24db Antenna as well Dan Metcalf Wireless Broadband Systems dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com 781-658-2075 www.wirelessbroadbandsystems.com I'd be interested
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00213.html (11,914 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu