Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+AP\-1000\s+\&\s+200mw\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+AP\-1000\s+\&\s+200mw\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Karlnet] AP-1000 & 200mw (score: 1): Author: "Bill Fisher" <fisher@akorn.net>; Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 16:51:25 -0400; I got 2 200mw cards in today to test. I have successfully installed them in a AP-1000 after disabling WEP on each port and enabling TurboCell on each port. I currently only have one Lucent card, and; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00091.html (7,909 bytes)
2. Re: [Karlnet] AP-1000 & 200mw (score: 1): Author: "Norm Young" <npyoung@applegatebroadband.net>; Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 14:19:02 -0700; Bill, I'm seeing a S/N ratio much lower. Both signal and noise are much depressed over the Orinoco card...but for that matter, running the SOM for a link of 7.5mi with 20dB xmit power into a 15 dB an; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00094.html (9,287 bytes)
3. RE: [Karlnet] AP-1000 & 200mw (score: 1): Author: "Bill Fisher" <fisher@akorn.net>; Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 17:22:02 -0400; Definately a bad radio or poor receiver. Will be interesting to see what others report. Tony, have you done any tests on these receivers? Bill; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00095.html (7,878 bytes)
4. RE: [Karlnet] AP-1000 & 200mw (score: 1): Author: "Tony " <tonylist@wwwbiz.com>; Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 20:08:48 -0400; Bill All the test have been done NOT using software as it can come times not be trusted. From what I have been told by KN there is a problem in that the numbers reported back from the radio are not c; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-05/msg00099.html (8,902 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]