Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jbaker@peakinet.net: 167 ]

Total 167 documents matching your query.

61. RE: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1)
Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 13:53:47 -0700
Your descriptions are very difficult to follow. I think I understand it as your KN-200 doesn't have any IP's assigned to the wireless interfaces... this doesn't matter. Connect to it on either wirele
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00158.html (15,708 bytes)

62. RE: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1)
Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 14:21:09 -0700
No, you won't be able to get to it through the AP-1000 unless it, and the adjacent RG, are both in bridging mode. How can you get to it via routed if there's nothing routed? Regards, Jayson A. Baker
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00160.html (11,483 bytes)

63. RE: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1)
Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 17:26:20 -0700
Is the IP on your computer in the same subnet as that of the KN-200? Regards, Jayson A. Baker Peak Internet Solutions No this did not work. I plugged right into the RG's Ethernet port via a crossover
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00162.html (10,355 bytes)

64. RE: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1)
Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 18:52:17 -0700
And does it show up in the local network scan? Regards, Jayson A. Baker Peak Internet Solutions Yes they are all in the same subnet. John the routed _______________________________________________ Ka
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00165.html (11,530 bytes)

65. RE: [Karlnet] KN-200 better than AP-1000? WAS Flashrom hardware?How about a Routerboard 230? (score: 1)
Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:07:01 -0700
Hi, The KN-200 is better than an AP-1000/WavePoint-II? We currently have a WavePoint-II w/ ISP Base software at one of our (actually, our only) Turbocell site. It has about 30 satellites on it right
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00174.html (11,379 bytes)

66. RE: [Karlnet] KN-200 better than AP-1000? WAS Flashromhardware?Howabout a Routerboard 230? (score: 1)
Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:11:17 -0700
"stable flashrom setup" What, exactly, does that mean? The KN boards have flash slots - what would someone use that for? Regards, Jayson A. Baker Peak Internet Solutions --Original Message-- From: ka
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00175.html (13,833 bytes)

67. RE: [Karlnet] KN-200 better than AP-1000?WASFlashromhardware?Howabout a Routerboard 230? (score: 1)
Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:16:58 -0700
Oh yeah, I remember the days of Boot ROM. But if Karlnet is booting on an Ethernet interface - this doesn't do me much good getting it into a Silver card, does it? Regards, Jayson A. Baker Peak Inter
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00177.html (16,579 bytes)

68. RE: [Karlnet] KN-200 better thanAP-1000?WASFlashromhardware?Howabouta Routerboard 230? (score: 1)
Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:26:58 -0700
Then I guess it makes sense that an KN-200 would blow away an old WPII! Great! Needed a reason to make a trip up to that site before it snows. Regards, Jayson A. Baker Peak Internet Solutions --Origi
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00180.html (19,511 bytes)

69. RE: [Karlnet] KN-200 better than AP-1000? WAS Flashromhardware?Howabout a Routerboard 230? (score: 1)
Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:33:15 -0700
Awesome. Thanks for everyone's input on this! Regards, Jayson A. Baker Peak Internet Solutions --Original Message-- From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On Behal
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00188.html (14,038 bytes)

70. RE:[Karlnet]KARLNETRESPONSE_ReductionofKarlnetfeaturesw/outnotification. (score: 1)
Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:56:19 -0700
Why's this greyed-out on everything we have which we just upgraded to 4.44? Regards, Jayson A. Baker Peak Internet Solutions --Original Message-- From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-b
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00208.html (13,614 bytes)

71. WARP - Was: RE:[Karlnet]KARLNETRESPONSE_ReductionofKarlnetfeaturesw/outnotification. (score: 1)
Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:17:14 -0700
Yeah, it's gryed out - i.e. I cannot select it to enable it... Regards, Jayson A. Baker Peak Internet Solutions --Original Message-- From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNo
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00209.html (15,357 bytes)

72. RE: [Karlnet] KN-50 SNMP/ Net Management Server (score: 1)
Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:48:13 -0700
We use MRTG to graph signal/noise and traffic in/out on every piece of hardware we have - including all our KN-100/200 boards that we use as the CPE. Regards, Jayson A. Baker Peak Internet Solutions
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00230.html (33,513 bytes)

73. RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet RADIUS dictionary entries? (score: 1)
Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 08:20:33 -0700
First of all, you cannot set different up/down rates. There is one rate, and this is what it is. The RADIUS info is on their website somewhere - but their examples don't work. When asking their suppo
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00249.html (9,826 bytes)

74. RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet RADIUS dictionary entries? (score: 1)
Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 08:41:57 -0700
Says who? What a waste. Karlnet throttles at the CPE - saves a lot of wasted air time. Regards, Jayson A. Baker Peak Internet Solutions --Original Message-- From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com [mailt
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00252.html (12,028 bytes)

75. RE: [Karlnet] Agere OEM Card Sources (score: 1)
Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 08:43:58 -0700
Can someone at Karlnet comment on this? Who do we talk to? What do they cost? Regards, Jayson A. Baker Peak Internet Solutions Karlnet seem to be supplying Dell/Agere cards I assume surplus they seem
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00253.html (8,722 bytes)

76. RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet RADIUS dictionary entries? (score: 1)
Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:12:21 -0700
Throttling twice is pointless. If you're already throttled, what's the point of throttling? I do not believe it "drops" the packets either. A packet is a packet is a packet. Throttling is not "select
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00255.html (14,777 bytes)

77. RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet RADIUS dictionary entries? (score: 1)
Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:18:02 -0700
When you say throttling at the CPE, are you setting it in the Interface Setup fields? For the Ethernet, or the wireless interface? Was it Turbocell, or were you trying to do it with 802.11? We do all
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00259.html (18,202 bytes)

78. RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet RADIUS dictionary entries? (score: 1)
Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:23:50 -0700
Regards, Jayson A. Baker Peak Internet Solutions Yes I am using the interface fields [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] Interface [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] CPE retransmits) one exam
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00261.html (20,922 bytes)

79. RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet RADIUS dictionary entries? (score: 1)
Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:31:25 -0700
That may have been a reason. Throttle at the ISP Base. Regards, Jayson A. Baker Peak Internet Solutions Also both interfaces were used [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] [mailto:karlnet-bounces@W
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00263.html (23,366 bytes)

80. RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet RADIUS dictionary entries? (score: 1)
Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:56:44 -0700
We've not done anything on the CPE end in production, but we have 40+ users on one ISP Base (CPE's all KN-100's, Orinoco Cards, all good signal) with throttling at the ISP Base. All users typically g
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00266.html (24,650 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
This search system is powered by Namazu