Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*CT\s+and\s+clock\s+accuracy\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*CT\s+and\s+clock\s+accuracy\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. CT and clock accuracy (score: 1): Author: richardlo@devax.admin.athabascau.ca (Richard Loken); Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 11:32:40 -0600 (MDT); I was preparing the field day logs yesterday which were created using CT v.7 on a laptop. The clock gained close to two hours over the 24 hours of the contest!!! The same thing happened with a differ; /archives//html/CT-User/1995-07/msg00023.html (7,332 bytes)
2. CT and clock accuracy (score: 1): Author: lyndon@multivac.orthanc.com (Lyndon Nerenberg); Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 11:57:31 -0700; Caveat: this was CT 7, not the current release. The problem I saw was that CT's clock would start running at double the normal speed. I wasn't able to determine just what caused the clock speed doubl; /archives//html/CT-User/1995-07/msg00025.html (7,409 bytes)
3. CT and clock accuracy (score: 1): Author: reidarb@oslonett.no (Reidar Bo); Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 22:27:04 +0200; I am experiencing the same thing with my 486 Twinhead laptop using CT v9.23 with Windows 3.11. I solve the problem by starting CT from MS-DOS. However, I don't experience this problem when using my C; /archives//html/CT-User/1995-07/msg00026.html (7,305 bytes)
4. CT and clock accuracy (score: 1): Author: dl6rai!root@dl6rai.muc.de (dl6rai!root@dl6rai.muc.de); Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 17:41:22 +0200; We used CT version 9 during last year's WAE DX Contest CW when we were M/S with DL2MEH, DL2NBU and myself. DL2NBU's computer was set up as the. Station 1 computer and so dictated the time in the net; /archives//html/CT-User/1995-07/msg00034.html (8,379 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]