Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+CT10\.00\.001\s+MS\s+WPX\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+CT10\.00\.001\s+MS\s+WPX\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] CT10.00.001 MS WPX (score: 1): Author: "g3rir demon" <g3rir@ackerley24.demon.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 17:48:50 -0000; On looking at the WPX rules for Multi One (same as mult-single?) I discover that a multiplier station should use a serial number sequence separate from the run station. CT (10.0 I am testing) appears; /archives//html/CT-User/2004-02/msg00018.html (6,882 bytes)
2. Re: [ct-user] CT10.00.001 MS WPX (score: 1): Author: Ted Demopoulos <kt1v@demop.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 09:27:50 -0500; Although I don't remember the details, I ran into a similar issue with a M/S for WPX about 2 years ago. What I found was the powers that be didn't really care as long as a consistent numbering scheme; /archives//html/CT-User/2004-02/msg00019.html (7,976 bytes)
3. Re: [ct-user] CT10.00.001 MS WPX (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 08:07:59 -0800 (PST); Steve Merchant, K6AW is the head WPX honcho now. 73 - Jim AD1C == Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863 USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.com PGP; /archives//html/CT-User/2004-02/msg00020.html (7,226 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]