Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+CT\s+9\.43\s+and\s+Ethenet\s+Nettsr\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+CT\s+9\.43\s+and\s+Ethenet\s+Nettsr\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] CT 9.43 and Ethenet Nettsr (score: 1): Author: NB1B@aol.com (NB1B@aol.com); Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 07:19:55 EDT; My experience echoes that of Wil DJ7AA. I tried CT 9.43 on a working Ethernet network at W1KM yesterday. 9.43 wouldn't work- switched back to 9.39 and it worked without a problem. OTOH, we have a lot; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-10/msg00065.html (7,109 bytes)
2. [ct-user] CT 9.43 and Ethenet Nettsr (score: 1): Author: G.La Parola, IT9BLB" <glaparol@mbox.infcom.it (G.La Parola, IT9BLB); Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 23:04:57 +0200; Just my two cents: We tried CT 9.43 on 3 of the 6 PCs that worked during IH9P'98 operations (NETTSR of course): 9.43 wouldn't work here too; we found some "one-way" communications between 2 of the PC; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-10/msg00069.html (7,874 bytes)
3. [ct-user] CT 9.43 and Ethenet Nettsr (score: 1): Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@berkshire.net> (David Robbins); Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 22:41:55 +0000; yes, there is a problem. k1ea saw it first hand at kc1xx. no answer yet, but we know it is a problem. -- Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com WW; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-10/msg00073.html (7,083 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]