Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+10\s+Meter\s+Contest\s+\-\-\s+ARRL\-SECTION\:\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+10\s+Meter\s+Contest\s+\-\-\s+ARRL\-SECTION\:\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] 10 Meter Contest -- ARRL-SECTION: (score: 1): Author: Charles W. Shaw" <n5ul@wtaccess.com (Charles W. Shaw); Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 20:16:18 +0000; I checked what I had already entered, found that element missing, and sent a revised contest entry. Betcha that ARRL will have quite a lot of entries already which are missing this info. And will get; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-12/msg00063.html (8,165 bytes)
2. [ct-user] 10 Meter Contest -- ARRL-SECTION: (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt" <n6ig@hotmail.com (Jim Pratt); Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 21:17:08 -0000; [AD1C: Aomeone has already filed a bug against this problem. CT should prompt you for your section when you type WRITELOG if you have not entered it before.] CT doesn't ask you what your ARRL section; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-12/msg00065.html (8,442 bytes)
3. [ct-user] 10 Meter Contest -- ARRL-SECTION: (score: 1): Author: Alan C. Zack" <k6acz@earthlink.net (Alan C. Zack); Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 18:41:01 -0800; Should this be added to the summary, Cabrillo file, or both? -- ____________________________________________________________ Extra Class Amateur Radio Station K6ACZ Anaheim, Southern California, USA; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-12/msg00068.html (9,069 bytes)
4. [ct-user] 10 Meter Contest -- ARRL-SECTION: (score: 1): Author: Mike Gilmer - N2MG <n2mg@contesting.com> (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 11 Dec 2000 20:04:38 -0800; The Cabrillo file should have a line like this near the top: ARRL-SECTION: WNY Of course, you should use the right section abbreviations. 73 Mike N2MG ________________________________________________; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-12/msg00069.html (9,901 bytes)
5. [ct-user] 10 Meter Contest -- ARRL-SECTION: (score: 1): Author: Joseph.Agius@sybase.com (Joseph.Agius@sybase.com); Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 07:32:28 -0500; For 10 meter contest shouldn't it be ARRL-SECTION: NY States are used not arrl sections What happens if we alreasy submitted? Should we send another corrected version or is it obvious from the exchan; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-12/msg00071.html (11,429 bytes)
6. [ct-user] 10 Meter Contest -- ARRL-SECTION: (score: 1): Author: Mike Gilmer - N2MG <n2mg@contesting.com> (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 12 Dec 2000 04:53:01 -0800; Last year's results as evidence: http://www.arrl.org/contests/results/99/10MResults.pdf shows they are sorted (and awarded, too, I think) by section. So they need to know that information. 73 Mike N2; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-12/msg00072.html (12,887 bytes)
7. [ct-user] 10 Meter Contest -- ARRL-SECTION: (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu> (Jim Reisert AD1C); Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 11:22:31 -0500; Results and awards for all ARRL contests are broken down BY SECTION. That is what they want that information for. So what Mike suggested is correct. -- Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu> http:; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-12/msg00074.html (8,027 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]