Mail Archive Search: <+from:us4lgw@ukrpost.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:us4lgw@ukrpost.net: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] Upgrade computer strategy (score: 1): Author: us4lgw at ukrpost.net (us4lgw@ukrpost.net); Date: Thu Aug 7 13:03:45 2003; I have another question. My Win98 PC has 2 network adapters: first one is external internet connection, other one is for internal network. PC runs Winroute software for internet sharing. Can i run CT; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-08/msg00029.html (8,057 bytes)
2. Re: [ct-user] cw keying forn CTWIN (score: 1): Author: us4lgw@ukrpost.net; Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 15:14:27 +0300; Hello Tony, CW keying does not work on COM ports in CTWin -- Best regards, us4lgw mailto:us4lgw@ukrpost.net _______________________________________________ CT-User mailing list CT-User@contesting.com; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-10/msg00031.html (7,723 bytes)
3. Re[2]: [ct-user] cw keying forn CTWIN (score: 1): Author: us4lgw@ukrpost.net; Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 17:45:23 +0300; Hello Tony, I think, the best way is to use parallel (LPT) port of your laptop PC to key and CW manipulate your rig. We (UT7L contest team) use this method for many years and it works good enough und; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-10/msg00033.html (7,584 bytes)
4. Re: [ct-user] wireless ct (score: 1): Author: us4lgw@ukrpost.net; Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:45:30 +0300; Hello David, What kind of wireless network do you mean ? Is it RadioEthernet, Infrared, Packet radio, etc. ? -- Best regards, us4lgw mailto:us4lgw@ukrpost.net ________________________________________; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-10/msg00066.html (7,610 bytes)
5. Re[2]: [ct-user] wireless ct (score: 1): Author: us4lgw@ukrpost.net; Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:51:46 +0300; Sorry. No suggestions. May be something wrong with UDP protocol settings of the router -- Best regards, us4lgw mailto:us4lgw@ukrpost.net _______________________________________________ CT-User mailin; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-10/msg00071.html (8,093 bytes)
6. Re[2]: [ct-user] wireless ct (score: 1): Author: us4lgw@ukrpost.net; Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 10:50:18 +0300; Hello David, I don't have much experience in wireless ethernet. But i know there are some settings concerning the basic network protocols (priority, bandwidth etc.). You can decrease priority and ban; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-10/msg00081.html (8,289 bytes)
7. Re: [ct-user] CT Ethernet Network Question (score: 1): Author: <us4lgw@ukrpost.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:53:15 +0200 (EET); It looks most likely You have problem with your network adapter. Probable it has damaged final input/output stage. But there are some other causes. If you use na old ISA adapter it might have a few j; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00025.html (7,501 bytes)
8. Re: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 and Win95 help (score: 1): Author: Serge Vaskovsky US4LGW <us4lgw@ukrpost.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:11:03 +0300; Hello TOM If you'll follow this link http://k1ea.com/download/index.htm you'll see the words "WIN95 is not supported" in ct9.92.001 description. By the way, did you try to load .bin file with a some; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00042.html (8,191 bytes)
9. Re: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down, (WAS: CT 9.92.001 and Win95help) (score: 1): Author: Serge Vaskovsky US4LGW <us4lgw@ukrpost.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 17:09:39 +0300; At first, I explain my setup: PC #1 : AMD K6 233 MHz, 32 Mb RAM, 6 Gb Hdd, 2x Lan 10 Mbit, OS: Win98 PC #2 : Intel Pentium 133 MHz, 32 Mb RAM, 1,5 Gb Hdd, Lan 10 Mbit, OS: Win98 PC #3 : Cyrix 6x86 at; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00047.html (9,184 bytes)
10. Re: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down (score: 1): Author: Serge Vaskovsky US4LGW <us4lgw@ukrpost.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 13:18:27 +0300; Well, Gentlemen The final results of our discussions are : - upgrade computer to use CT 9.92.xxx with its all features (DOS or Win, it doesn't matter)to (min) P-II 400 MHz, 128 Mb RAM; - use an older; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00056.html (8,264 bytes)
11. Re: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down (score: 1): Author: Serge Vaskovsky US4LGW <us4lgw@ukrpost.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:44:50 +0300; So, should we upgrade our old 233 MHz PC's for using CTWin while other more complex programs like Adobe Photoshop or Corel Draw running quite good on 233 MHz 32 RAM ? Ken, what is your opinion? -- Be; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00088.html (8,301 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]