Mail Archive Search: <+from:n5nj at gte.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:n5nj: 149 ] [ at: 5140 ] [ gte.net: 6 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] M2 call entry quirk?? (score: 196): Author: n5nj at gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ); Date: Wed Apr 2 22:36:53 2003; What version of CT were you running? We used 9.88 at AA5NT in the M2 category, and it, being compliant with the new rules, issues numbers separately for each station so this is not a problem any long; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-04/msg00017.html (8,642 bytes)
2. [ct-user] CT.988 & WPX (score: 196): Author: n5nj at gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ); Date: Mon Mar 31 06:40:51 2003; We used CT988 at AA5NT this weekend. We were multi-2 and used NETTSR networking with a Com port connected TNC. FT1000D, and an FT1000MP both controlled properly. ( I did not try split operation mysel; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-03/msg00082.html (8,190 bytes)
3. [ct-user] CT9.84 CRTL F1/F2, MODE SELECT problem for VHF SS TST (score: 196): Author: n5nj at gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ); Date: Thu Jan 23 06:16:36 2003; any given grid square, regardless of mode. " According to this, there's no reason to have mode at all in ARRL VHF contests as part of the log - nevermind whether it's FM or SSB. I don't have any pro; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-01/msg00030.html (10,997 bytes)
4. [ct-user] Full version of CT (score: 193): Author: n5nj at gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ); Date: Sun Apr 6 06:03:33 2003; http://www.k1ea.com; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-04/msg00038.html (7,062 bytes)
5. [ct-user] ct/wpx (score: 193): Author: n5nj at gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ); Date: Tue Mar 25 20:01:26 2003; There is no difference in the way you operate the contest. You'll have to edit the Cabrillo file to match your category.; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-03/msg00073.html (6,881 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]