Mail Archive Search: <+from:n4to@ct.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:n4to@ct.net: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] CT & IC-706 (score: 1): Author: Victor A. Dubois" <n4to@ct.net (Victor A. Dubois); Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 00:10:40 -0400; Does CT support the IC-706? I know the 706 isn't listed as being supported, but perhaps someone has had luck getting CT to work with the 706. I sure would appreciate the information as I plan on taki; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-09/msg00023.html (7,025 bytes)
2. [ct-user] CT936 Time problem (score: 1): Author: Victor A. Dubois" <n4to@ct.net (Victor A. Dubois); Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 05:18:40 -0500; We used CT936 during the weekend in the ARRL contest and it worked perfectly. I just printed QSL labels for the ARRL SSB contest and they are all 5 hours off. The log is correct, but the labels gener; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-03/msg00014.html (7,135 bytes)
3. [ct-user] CT936 Time Problem (score: 1): Author: Victor A. Dubois" <n4to@ct.net (Victor A. Dubois); Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 15:27:53 -0500; Thanks to K6KR and AD1C for their suggestion to use CT_TIME, and to Ken K1EA, for saying "I can fix that". I'll bet a change to QSL9.EXE may be forthcoming to solve the problem in the future for ever; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-03/msg00017.html (7,109 bytes)
4. [ct-user] Program Aborts (score: 1): Author: Victor A. Dubois" <n4to@ct.net (Victor A. Dubois); Date: Sun, 01 Feb 1998 01:06:47 -0500; I'm having trouble getting CT to run on a different machine. It presently runs perfectly on my 486DX2-66, and was running well on my Pentium 166 until I had a hard disk crash. I copies all files from; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-02/msg00000.html (6,752 bytes)
5. [ct-user] Ft-1000MP & CT (score: 1): Author: Victor A. Dubois" <n4to@ct.net (Victor A. Dubois); Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 23:33:29 -0500 (EST); I am unable to get CT and my new FT-1000MP to correctly communicate. I have no trouble with the TR logging program, but haven't broken the CT habit yet. I'm at the following point. Am using the versi; /archives//html/CT-User/1997-01/msg00009.html (8,044 bytes)
6. [ct-user] FT-1000MP & CT -- SUCCESS (score: 1): Author: Victor A. Dubois" <n4to@ct.net (Victor A. Dubois); Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 19:08:03 -0500 (EST); Thanks to all for your suggestions the one that hit the nail on the head was Jon, W4ZW. As soon as I folowed the procedure he recommended, all works fine, and they rig and computer communicate correc; /archives//html/CT-User/1997-01/msg00014.html (7,395 bytes)
7. [ct-user] Ft-1000MP & CT --SUCCESS (score: 1): Author: Victor A. Dubois" <n4to@ct.net (Victor A. Dubois); Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 19:15:54 -0500 (EST); Sorry for the additional bandwidth but the thanks for the success goes to W4ZW, and K6CT who had the exact same recommendations. Reset, and set the baud rate to 4800 and 2 stop bits (4800N2). Thanks; /archives//html/CT-User/1997-01/msg00015.html (7,096 bytes)
8. OMNI VI and 486 Computer (score: 1): Author: n4to@ct.net (Victor A. Dubois); Date: Sun, 23 Jun 1996 22:54:42 -0400 (EDT); Thanks again to the many that responded before to my plea for help making my OMNI VI and computer communicate with each other. I've been able to make them communicate, but have noticed a peculiarity; /archives//html/CT-User/1996-06/msg00025.html (7,328 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]