- 1. [ct-user] Who Reads the Bug Reports? (score: 1)
- Author: kf2hc@comcast.net (Brian - KF2HC)
- Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 06:43:15 -0400
- During WPX SSB a couple of weeks back I reported a couple of bugs to the "CT Bug Report" page. To date I've received no offical response. Does anyone read them anymore? Brian KF2HC kf2hc@comcast.net
- /archives//html/CT-User/2002-04/msg00012.html (6,416 bytes)
- 2. [ct-user] WPX - SSB QSOs Log as CW (score: 1)
- Author: kf2hc@comcast.net (Brian - KF2HC)
- Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 15:16:54 -0500
- Using version 9.69.001 our CQ WPX SSB log was set up for Multi-Single SSB. We started on 10m and the first QSO logged properly. All QSOs after that log as CW contacts with 599 reports and the CW spee
- /archives//html/CT-User/2002-03/msg00069.html (6,834 bytes)
- 3. [ct-user] More CQ WPX Problems (score: 1)
- Author: kf2hc@comcast.net (Brian - KF2HC)
- Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 07:56:11 -0500
- CQ WPX SSB M/S w/ versions 9.69 & 9.71: In addition to SSB QSOs logging as CW and being unable to change modes (which I see reported on the Bug Report page as far back as Feb.) I've found the serial
- /archives//html/CT-User/2002-03/msg00070.html (6,802 bytes)
- 4. [ct-user] Sorry for Extra Report (score: 1)
- Author: kf2hc@comcast.net (Brian - KF2HC)
- Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 08:28:06 -0500
- After making my second posting regarding CQ WPX serial numbers in M/S setup I learned this issue has already been reported. I'm sorry for making a posting about an already know "bug". I've been off t
- /archives//html/CT-User/2002-03/msg00072.html (6,123 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu