Mail Archive Search: <+from:k1ttt@arrl.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:k1ttt@arrl.net: 99 ]

Total 99 documents matching your query.

61. [ct-user] test (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 19:08:56 -0000; Test message, sri, just changing os and want to make sure I have mail set up properly to get through reflectors. David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto://k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Clust; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00121.html (6,517 bytes)
62. [ct-user] m/m overwriting log line bug? (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2001 12:24:15 +0000; has anyone else seen this with 9.64 or later? is there a way to cause it to happen so i can test latest versions?? i don't see anything in the release notes, has anything been done to fix it?? -- Dav; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00003.html (6,616 bytes)
63. [ct-user] Fw: CT967 networking broken? (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2001 18:54:43 +0000; 5 computer network running ok here in ss with ethernet. -- David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto://k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00005.html (7,658 bytes)
64. [ct-user] Let's talk about CT networking (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 22:32:50 +0000; the database is not shared across the ct network, each machine has its own copy. if you need to update the log file on the machine that crashed you will have to copy it from the other machine then ch; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00032.html (8,744 bytes)
65. [ct-user] Let's talk about CT networking (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2001 00:21:36 +0000; note, that this is no longer true. a 386dx is minimum now the latest versions will not run on 286 or earlier cpu's. and it requires something more than 2meg of ram for the latest versions to even loa; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00034.html (8,005 bytes)
66. [ct-user] 9.67 network bug (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 13:22:57 +0000; i haven't figured out the exact sequence yet, but within 100 qso's on only 3 machines i was able to get the bug to repeat that causes what you have typed in but haven't logged yet to dissappear. hasn; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00047.html (7,008 bytes)
67. [ct-user] 9.67 network bug (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 14:00:26 +0000; this may be related to the mode change bug i also noticed. on the ft-1000mp, ts-870, and ts-940 if i put the radio in cw when the contest is ssb ct seems to accept the mode change and starts logging; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00048.html (8,685 bytes)
68. [ct-user] mail problems and web site moved (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 17:55:12 +0000; if you tried to send me mail since friday morning and i haven't replied it probably got lost. my isp tried to 'upgrade' their mail server thursday night and 'thinks' they finally got it working. also; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00054.html (6,924 bytes)
69. [ct-user] mail problems and web site moved (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 19:33:16 +0000; if you tried to send me mail since friday morning and i haven't replied it probably got lost. my isp tried to 'upgrade' their mail server thursday night and 'thinks' they finally got it working. also; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00055.html (6,890 bytes)
70. [ct-user] 9.68 undocumented fix? (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:57:32 +0000; was something done to fix the filename/directory bug? or was that accidently fixed? any other undocumented changes?? -- David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto://k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net A; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00084.html (6,416 bytes)
71. [ct-user] Re: Super Check Partial Window (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 22:44:33 +0000; good question, i don't like where the supercheck window comes up now either. it used to be that you could hook a mouse up and set the windows the way you wanted them and the setup was stored in a sep; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00086.html (7,975 bytes)
72. [ct-user] Re: Super Check Partial Window (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 15:53:29 +0000; thanks, 'colorsave' is the key. its been quite a while since i messed with window locations. i had set up a colors.ini many years ago and i think it was last year ken changed something that made the; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00092.html (8,098 bytes)
73. [ct-user] CT TNC NETWORKING (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 20:36:02 +0100; in newer versions of ct there is much more network traffic, is your tnc connection not fast enough for the newer backbone? what is the problem you see? -- David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto://k1ttt@a; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-10/msg00051.html (7,100 bytes)
74. [ct-user] 9.64 (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 23:18:14 +0000; i started the contest with 9.64 because that one had seemed stable in s/o and m/s settings earlier, but we quickly found there was a bug that was randomly (apparently) causing one station's pending l; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-10/msg00089.html (6,992 bytes)
75. [ct-user] BUGS / QUESTION (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 15:16:27 +0100; of course you can do ethernet with 486's... i do it here with a room full of 386's with no problem. the only problem might be convincing someone that you want ISA bus ethernet cards and not PCI. -- D; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-09/msg00007.html (7,951 bytes)
76. [ct-user] BUGS / QUESTION (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 17:59:12 +0100; xircom used to make an ethernet adapter for laptops like that. it worked through the parallel port. i'll bet those are hard to find these days though... i know we had one laying around in the compute; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-09/msg00015.html (9,924 bytes)
77. [ct-user] new addresses (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 11:26:57 +0100; my new mail address is k1ttt@arrl.net please update your address books. the old ones will be valid for another month or so, but i may be slow checking for mail there. also, if you connect to my ar-cl; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-08/msg00023.html (6,791 bytes)
78. [ct-user] network update (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:19:47 +0100; yes, that is one problem with the coax connected network. basically all the cards run in parallel on the cable so if one card shorts to ground or sends continuously it kills the whole thing. there do; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-08/msg00030.html (9,100 bytes)
79. [ct-user] Ethernet Problem (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 23:04:09 +0100; those terminating resistors should always be cold, the normal power they dissipate is tiny. yes, i would say you had 3 blown ones, and i would suspect the fourth one. i would expect no dc voltage rea; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-08/msg00040.html (8,525 bytes)
80. [ct-user] wae ssb problem (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 18:32:01 -0000; It seems that hitting + while in the qtc form keys the tx and switches rx to the second rig in two radio setup... it stays there for several seconds then switches back, almost like its trying to send; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-09/msg00004.html (6,767 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]