Mail Archive Search: <+from:ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com: 122 ]

Total 122 documents matching your query.

101. E-Mail Addresses (score: 1): Author: ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com (David Robbins 413-494-6955 413-655-2714 (KY1H w h)); Date: Tue, 24 May 94 12:45:05 EDT; apparently your e-mail program is even worse than mine. on mine i see not only the from address, but every other address in between... sometimes 2 screens full of forwarding data. but if i do a 'repl; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-05/msg00042.html (7,311 bytes)
102. 'from' and 'reply' addresses (score: 1): Author: ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com (David Robbins 413-494-6955 413-655-2714 (KY1H w h)); Date: Tue, 24 May 94 12:51:47 EDT; again i have been caught by the differences in mailing lists. my last message was meant to go to the sender, which it would have on the contest reflector. but on this one the message looks like it or; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-05/msg00043.html (7,311 bytes)
103. E-Mail Addresses (score: 1): Author: ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com (Peter G. Smith); Date: Tue, 24 May 1994 10:27:57 -0700 (PDT); For convenience ... well, not really THAT convenient ... a relatively complete list of all ham radio users of the Internet (based primarily on USENET accesses) is available by ftp -- filename hams_on; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-05/msg00044.html (8,108 bytes)
104. Message from BRUNET at BCRVM1 (score: 1): Author: ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com (Robert Wood); Date: Tue, 24 May 1994 12:47:14 -0500 (CDT); /archives//html/CT-User/1994-05/msg00045.html (6,528 bytes)
105. version 9 (score: 1): Author: ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com (Steve Merchant); Date: Tue, 24 May 1994 12:16:13 -0700 (PDT); N4TQO: Ken, I used the "log onto A: and INSTALL" process on the s/w I got from you at Dayton and it worked fine. [386-33,387,DOS 6.2]. I guess the installer doesn't _always_ fail. (Isn't this always; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-05/msg00046.html (7,094 bytes)
106. 'from' and 'reply' addresses (score: 1): Author: ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com (Kim Culhan); Date: Tue, 24 May 1994 18:58:00 -0400 (EDT); [stuff deleted] The mail software I use (Pine, running on a Unix machine) offers the option: Use "Reply to:" address instead of "From:" address? (y/n/^C) [y]: each time you hit the key for 'Reply' af; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-05/msg00047.html (7,447 bytes)
107. E-Mail Addresses (score: 1): Author: ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com (Kim Culhan); Date: Tue, 24 May 1994 19:18:03 -0400 (EDT); The Standard for Internet email makes the sender's address available to the computer at the receive end, just for this reason -no user action required to achieve it. See above. The main reason the 's; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-05/msg00048.html (7,566 bytes)
108. E-Mail Addresses (score: 1): Author: ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com (Eric Gustafson); Date: Tue, 24 May 94 17:34:30 MST; Most (rational) mail utilities when sending a reply include the incoming CC: field in the header in the outgoing mail. All that is necessary is to do a normal reply and remember to edit the CC: field; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-05/msg00049.html (7,125 bytes)
109. K3KU Keying Circuit (score: 1): Author: ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com (Eric M. Guzman ); Date: Tue, 24 May 1994 21:19:06 -0500 (EST); Hi All. I'm trying to make the K3KU keying circuit from the page 19 of the CT User's Manual. The manual says the transistors are 1 PNP & 1 NPN but it doesn't say which I can use. From the previous ci; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-05/msg00050.html (6,572 bytes)
110. version 9 (score: 1): Author: ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com (Tim Totten); Date: Tue, 24 May 1994 23:18:47 -0400 (EDT); N4TQO replied: I helped N4OKX install CT9 last wknd, and I just installed mine tonight, and my experience matches N4TQO's. So, for laughs, I tried logging onto the C: drive and doing "A: INSTALL" and; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-05/msg00051.html (7,825 bytes)
111. CT Net traffic gen (score: 1): Author: ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com (hatcher_d); Date: Wed, 25 May 1994 09:53:15 +0100; CT Users, Sorry for extra bandwidth but I've been informed I forgot to mention the actual filename. Its "congest.zip" on "ftp.demon.co.uk" in "pub/ham". Hope its of use to you. - Darren - G7BKO; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-05/msg00052.html (6,277 bytes)
112. KY1H's msg on internet addressing (score: 1): Author: ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com (ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com); Date: Wed, 25 May 1994 04:46:42 -0400; Internal mail systems of various corporations and public e-mail services do NOT work the same. Attached below is one example of what happens to an internet message, before it arrives at my desk. As y; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-05/msg00053.html (8,506 bytes)
113. CW keying interfaces (score: 1): Author: ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com (Peter G. Smith); Date: Wed, 25 May 1994 12:12:19 -0700 (PDT); I just received an advert from a company offering a keying interface compatible with CT. They assert that if you are using an LPT port that the basic transistor/resistor interface is risky because th; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-05/msg00054.html (7,748 bytes)
114. CW keying interfaces (score: 1): Author: ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com (ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com); Date: Wed, 25 May 94 15:52:21 EDT; Pete, At hi pwr levels any xsistor-based switching system has failed here from time to time. The optoisolator trick is indeed the way to go. Keeping the RF out of the computer is a matter of keeping; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-05/msg00055.html (7,564 bytes)
115. Interfaces (score: 1): Author: ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com (DAVE CASE - KA1NCN); Date: Wed, 25 May 1994 16:34:06 -0400 (EDT); While we are on the subject are there any DVK interfaces that are commercially available? Either for LPT or COM ports (COM would lhave to be done by switching through dos or related) 73 Dave/KA1NCFN; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-05/msg00056.html (6,339 bytes)
116. Interfaces (score: 1): Author: ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com (ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com); Date: Wed, 25 May 94 18:05:40; DAVE A FEW ISSUES BACK THERE WAS AN INTERFACE TO KEY THE DVR IN THE 850S FROM CT OR NA VIA THE LOGGING PORT. I HAVEN'T BUILT IT YET BUT IT SHOULD WORK. IT USED XSISTORS TO SWITCH IN THE VARIOUS RESIS; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-05/msg00057.html (6,522 bytes)
117. CW keying interfaces (score: 1): Author: ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com (Peter G. Smith); Date: Wed, 25 May 1994 17:11:24 -0700 (PDT); Hi Walt -- Well, the problem here isn't RF, but as someone reminded me, I haven't checked with a high-impedance voltmeter to find out just what is actually going on at the input to the interface. It'; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-05/msg00058.html (8,450 bytes)
118. version 9 (score: 1): Author: ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com (Chad Kurszewski); Date: Wed, 25 May 94 07:43:21 PDT; I have installed CT v9 on two of KS9K's PCs. Both times, it worked perfectly (!) when logged onto the A: drive. (The only problem was I was going too fast and overwrote files in the CT (old ver) dire; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-05/msg00059.html (7,068 bytes)
119. wasted bandwidth apology (ignore if you can) (score: 1): Author: ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com (Jim Reisert AD1C 28-May-1994 1013); Date: Sat, 28 May 1994 10:08:58 -0400; Peter, VE3SUN asked: I changed this recently because topics were starting on the CT-USER list and ending up on CQ-CONTEST because people had to manually type in the list name when they replied to the; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-05/msg00060.html (7,176 bytes)
120. CT 9.01 observations from AA6MC (score: 1): Author: ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com (Dick Dievendorff); Date: Tue, 31 May 1994 11:49:43 -0700; I enjoyed using CT 9.01 in the WPX. I have a couple of minor glitches to report: I used the Band map feature quite a bit. I wasn't connected to packet cluster, so I used CTRL-ENTER to put in calls as; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-05/msg00061.html (10,362 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]