Mail Archive Search: <+from:TOMHURLEY@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:TOMHURLEY@aol.com: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] 10 Meter contest cabrillo output (score: 1): Author: TOMHURLEY@aol.com (TOMHURLEY@aol.com); Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 21:39:58 EST; I was just alerted by Dave, K1HT, that the cabrillo log I submitted to ARRL for the 10 meter contest did not have a line that defined my ARRL Section, as required. I checked back to my 2000 SS logs a; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-01/msg00022.html (7,238 bytes)
2. [ct-user] Idea for multiple OS support (score: 1): Author: TOMHURLEY@aol.com (TOMHURLEY@aol.com); Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 13:01:48 EDT; I certainly don't like the continuing bugs in CT. But your argument about spending lots of $$ to support a $50 software program seems to me to work against you. I'll buy a machine for my kids that wo; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-10/msg00042.html (7,822 bytes)
3. [ct-user] Bad VFO-B data (score: 1): Author: TOMHURLEY@aol.com (TOMHURLEY@aol.com); Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 05:28:14 EST; I believe the "reversed" a/b vfo spot problem may have something to do with when the op hits Alt F3 to announce the spot. I noticed that if I made the announce while transmitting to the dx station (w; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-03/msg00056.html (7,338 bytes)
4. [ct-user] Date format in .Log files (score: 1): Author: TOMHURLEY@aol.com (TOMHURLEY@aol.com); Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2000 23:14:25 EST; Oh wise ones, Well I'm on deadline to get the ARRL logs in and was about to send them tonight when I noticed something that may be awry. Your advice please. The date format in the .log files for both; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-03/msg00118.html (7,194 bytes)
5. [ct-user] 9.49 packet problems? (score: 1): Author: TOMHURLEY@aol.com (TOMHURLEY@aol.com); Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 20:04:28 EST; Same problem here. Had to go back to 9.46. Tom/K1TH -- Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com WWW: http://www.k1ea.com/ Questions: owner-ct-user@c; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-03/msg00158.html (6,587 bytes)
6. [ct-user] CT and WindowsNT Workstation (score: 1): Author: TOMHURLEY@aol.com (TOMHURLEY@aol.com); Date: Sun, 28 Nov 1999 22:56:56 EST; Friends and experts, I just picked up a **free** 486DX100 with 16 meg of ram from a family member. It's got WindowsNT Workstation operating system software loaded on it. Question: What to do? Try run; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-11/msg00197.html (7,600 bytes)
7. [ct-user] Importing CT9.39 to DXBase 4.6 (DOS) (score: 1): Author: TOMHURLEY@aol.com (TOMHURLEY@aol.com); Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 07:15:49 EST; I just upgraded to 9.39 for WPX from CT7.xx. Procedure here has been to import CT contest logs into DXBase 4.6 which is my master log. No problem importing version 7.xx for more than 15 past contests; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00150.html (7,652 bytes)
8. [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 and Win95 help (score: 1): Author: TOMHURLEY@aol.com; Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 23:12:17 EST; Tonight I tried to enter the 21st Century (well, the late 20th at least) and install CTWin 9.92.001 on my old Win95 shack machine. It's a Compaq Presario 6000 at 300MHz and 96 meg of RAM. Everything; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00041.html (6,663 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]