- 1. [ct-user] NETTSR + 3COM PCMCIA card (score: 1)
- Author: RNotarius@chester-engineers.com (Ron Notarius) (Ron Notarius)
- Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 07:19:44 -0400
- Which specific model 3COM PC Card? It makes a big difference. If you're using a 3C589, you need the 3C589.COM driver, NOT the older 3C509 or later 3C5X9 drivers (which are for the 3C509 series ISA NI
- /archives//html/CT-User/1999-05/msg00018.html (8,681 bytes)
- 2. Re[2]: [ct-user] FW: CT with Ethernet (score: 1)
- Author: RNotarius@chester-engineers.com (Ron Notarius) (Ron Notarius)
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 20:41:11 -0400
- I assume that nettsr would be for a peer-to-peer network. I'll be running a Netware server. Anything special I have to do for CT once I get the 2nd station & it's computer together? sure. check out m
- /archives//html/CT-User/1999-04/msg00043.html (9,549 bytes)
- 3. Re[3]: [ct-user] FW: CT with Ethernet (score: 1)
- Author: RNotarius@chester-engineers.com (Ron Notarius) (Ron Notarius)
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 07:47:09 -0400
- I didn't think such a simple question would stir up so much response!... For those who asked, the network in my house is entirely 10-Base2. The server is running 3 Ethernet flavors (802.2, 802.3, & E
- /archives//html/CT-User/1999-04/msg00046.html (12,514 bytes)
- 4. [ct-user] Kachina 505DSP2 (score: 1)
- Author: RNotarius@chester-engineers.com (Ron Notarius) (Ron Notarius)
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:02:23 -0500
- I saw the Kachina demo at Dayton last year. Very impressive. If only the control was via Ethernet instead of a serial port... But I have yet to run into one on the air, or seen anything else about it
- /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00063.html (8,340 bytes)
- 5. [ct-user] RE: Printing QSL9 labels in Avery 5160 format? (score: 1)
- Author: RNotarius@chester-engineers.com (Ron Notarius) (Ron Notarius)
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 10:41:51 -0500
- Jim, I'd import the data into a real database & manipulate the data from there. I import my CT data into my logs, which I keep in a dBase IV (soon to be Visual dBase 5.5) system I half wrote (I still
- /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00120.html (9,368 bytes)
- 6. Re[2]: [ct-user] Printing CT files under Windows 98 (score: 1)
- Author: RNotarius@chester-engineers.com (Ron Notarius) (Ron Notarius)
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 19:04:51 -0500
- However, while Dan is absolutely right, some versions of PRINT.EXE are DOS-version specific; if the DOS version doesn't match (& for Win 98 it's DOS 7.1... even tho the date stamps don't match Win 95
- /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00101.html (10,379 bytes)
- 7. Re[2]: [ct-user] CT 9.39 and Band Map (score: 1)
- Author: RNotarius@chester-engineers.com (Ron Notarius) (Ron Notarius)
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 19:01:19 -0500
- So what do you propose? I post my SN along with my query? (yeah, sure, THAT's secure.) Or will you settle for a copy of the cancelled check? Or do I have to show you my disks going back to version 6.
- /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00102.html (10,338 bytes)
- 8. Re[2]: [ct-user] VY0 (score: 1)
- Author: RNotarius@chester-engineers.com (Ron Notarius) (Ron Notarius)
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 22:46:41 -0500
- Ah, wayduhminit here... where was it said that Nunavut would be it's own RAC section? I think the point of the original post was that the new prefix would have to be added... but a new section? That
- /archives//html/CT-User/1999-01/msg00024.html (8,744 bytes)
- 9. [ct-user] drivers (score: 1)
- Author: RNotarius@chester-engineers.com (Ron Notarius) (Ron Notarius)
- Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 12:55:06 -0500
- 1. What type of network connector do the cards have, ie, BNC, AUI, RJ-11, RJ-45, Token Ring? 2. Are there any other markings on the card itself to indicate a model number, speed, or type? 3. Can you
- /archives//html/CT-User/1999-01/msg00035.html (8,280 bytes)
- 10. [ct-user] DOS drivers Win98 (score: 1)
- Author: RNotarius@chester-engineers.com (Ron Notarius) (Ron Notarius)
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 23:55:31 -0500
- Load them in CONFIG.SYS & AUTOEXEC.BAT, just like we always did. Remember, Win 98 is really Win 4.1 & DOS 7.1 just like Win 95B... ... if Win 95 was really Win 4.0, and Win 98 is really Win 4.1, then
- /archives//html/CT-User/1999-01/msg00063.html (8,053 bytes)
- 11. [ct-user] 935 and 486 computer? (score: 1)
- Author: RNotarius@chester-engineers.com (Ron Notarius) (Ron Notarius)
- Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 11:44:54 -0500
- I've heard of similar problems. Check your CONFIG.SYS file to make sure you're maximizing memory as much as possible, especially if the computers involved require you to exclude a memory portion for
- /archives//html/CT-User/1998-12/msg00085.html (8,404 bytes)
- 12. Re[2]: [ct-user] Mouse Support (score: 1)
- Author: RNotarius@chester-engineers.com (Ron Notarius) (Ron Notarius)
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 00:38:04 -0500
- Although a "clean" install of Win 9x does not create a C:\DOS directory, you can find the equivalents of the old DOS external commands in C:\WINDOWS\COMMAND. Either way, tho, you need to run the old
- /archives//html/CT-User/1998-11/msg00073.html (9,151 bytes)
- 13. [ct-user] CT and Time (score: 1)
- Author: RNotarius@chester-engineers.com (Ron Notarius) (Ron Notarius)
- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 08:19:18 -0500
- If you're using a Win 9x or NT 4 machine, make sure it's not automatically changing the internal clock time from Standard Time to DST & back. The default is for the time change to occur automatically
- /archives//html/CT-User/1998-10/msg00134.html (8,834 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu