Mail Archive Search: <+from:N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>

Results:

References: [ +from:N7MAL@CITLINK.NET: 99 ]

Total 99 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] AR10.dat (score: 1): Author: n7mal@citlink.net (N7MAL); Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:34:38 -0000; Here's the link. http://www.k1ea.com/dat/index.htm MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm http://www.geocities.com/n7mal/; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-12/msg00065.html (7,662 bytes)
2. [ct-user] Fw: [4338.sscw] Re: N7MAL SSCW SOLP (score: 1): Author: n7mal@citlink.net (N7MAL); Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 01:02:32 -0000; Between N5KO and this list perhaps someone has an answer. I just received this from the ARRL. I'm sure I'm not the only one. MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm http://ww; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-11/msg00005.html (23,024 bytes)
3. [ct-user] Fw: [4338.sscw] Re: N7MAL SSCW SOLP (score: 1): Author: n7mal@citlink.net (N7MAL); Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 05:26:57 -0000; Several replies including the one from Trey made the same suggestion regarding the line wrap. My problem with that explanation is this; the robot rejected approx. 20 entries out of 380. All 380 were; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-11/msg00011.html (21,375 bytes)
4. [ct-user] FOLLOW-UP CABRILLO FILE (score: 1): Author: n7mal@citlink.net (N7MAL); Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 06:55:10 -0000; Here is the official answer from Trey: Each one of your lines created two "errors", because the QSO: line was missing something from the end and the "missing" part that had wrapped over to a new line; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-11/msg00013.html (7,454 bytes)
5. [ct-user] THANK YOU KEN (score: 1): Author: n7mal@citlink.net (N7MAL); Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 20:35:39 -0000; I will be the first one to pitch a hissie-fit if I perceive something to be wrong and I will also be the first to say thank you when you get something right. THANK YOU KEN for eliminating the ugly re; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-10/msg00015.html (6,387 bytes)
6. [ct-user] 7.81 problems (score: 1): Author: n7mal@citlink.net (N7MAL); Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 02:52:35 -0000; So far during CQP I've noticed 2 problems with ver 7.81(DOS). It does not recognize dupes. If you type a call you've worked before it says "needed call". It only tells you it was a dupe after you log; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-10/msg00018.html (6,544 bytes)
7. [ct-user] Display problem CT 970 for Field Day (score: 1): Author: n7mal@citlink.net (N7MAL); Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 02:42:02 -0000; I complained, to no avail, vociferously, several months ago about 'ONE RADIO' and requested Ken make it optional. It is a class of entry used by a very small minority of CT users, but we all must suf; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-06/msg00028.html (8,477 bytes)
8. [ct-user] COLORSAVE (score: 1): Author: n7mal@citlink.net (N7MAL); Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 03:58:32 -0000; This question has probably been asked/answered 100 times but I need it one more time. I have my own color scheme for 'CHECK PARTIAL'. It probably only makes sense to me but then I'm the only one usin; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-02/msg00024.html (6,585 bytes)
9. [ct-user] ONE RADIO (score: 1): Author: n7mal@citlink.net (N7MAL); Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 20:26:22 -0000; I guess as I'm getting older little things bother me more. Why do we have that ugly red square that says "ONE RADIO". I would be willing to guess 97% of the 'registered' users of CT only have 'ONE RA; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-02/msg00042.html (6,949 bytes)
10. [ct-user] ONE RADIO (score: 1): Author: n7mal@citlink.net (N7MAL); Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 07:56:46 -0000; Let me try this again. Because we are unable to send attachments please click on this link: http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/CT1.htm They say a picture is worth 1000 words. You will clearly see why the big; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-02/msg00044.html (7,525 bytes)
11. [ct-user] FOLLOW-UP: ONE-RADIO, COLORSAVE (score: 1): Author: n7mal@citlink.net (N7MAL); Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 05:09:48 -0000; I just finished responding to 22 private e-mails regarding one-radio and colorsave. I found many guys had questions, some of which should have been public but they may have been intimidated by the mo; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-02/msg00048.html (8,119 bytes)
12. Fw: [ct-user] Band "pre-set" in CT V9 (score: 1): Author: n7mal@citlink.net (N7MAL); Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 06:42:30 -0000; I'm beginning to understand why some folks get frustrated with this reflector. I think the 'answer' to your question is no. Every piece of software has to start in some condition, CT starts default t; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-02/msg00072.html (9,801 bytes)
13. [ct-user] DVPs for sale (score: 1): Author: n7mal@citlink.net (N7MAL); Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 18:19:29 -0000; What am I missing here? I signed up for this reflector because ""My Icom 7xx won't work with CT - what is wrong?"" and other related ""PROBLEMS and/or ISSUES"" involving CT. Selling a CT(only) relate; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-01/msg00004.html (10,099 bytes)
14. [ct-user] CT 9.7 & CTWIN 9.7 (score: 1): Author: n7mal@citlink.net (N7MAL); Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 12:55:44 -0000; Today I had the time and energy to download the 2 most current versions. I'm sure glad I didn't attempt to use either during the contest. CTWIN 9.7: It's broke right at the startup screen. I loaded i; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00105.html (7,511 bytes)
15. [ct-user] re: ct 9.7 & ctwin 9.7 (score: 1): Author: n7mal@citlink.net (N7MAL); Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 17:39:56 -0000; K1EP wrote: "Bad command or filename is a message from DOS usually when you execute a file from the DOS prompt. If you are using a batch file to run CT, then one of the lines after you invoke CT is b; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00109.html (7,107 bytes)
16. Fw: [SPAM] [ct-user] CQ Tucson (score: 1): Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>; Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 04:34:56 -0000; F.Y.I. There have been several instances recently when my ISP decides a message is spam. I have ct-user in my 'good-guy' list but the software on my ISP seems to score content higher. Attached to the; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-10/msg00029.html (7,695 bytes)
17. Re: [ct-user] Com Port Keying (score: 1): Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>; Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 09:30:59 -0000; K4OJ asked: "Why would you want to use the com ports?" I've used a serial port since the late 80's when I first became a CT user. I built the interface then and it has never failed. Why would anyone; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-11/msg00075.html (10,884 bytes)
18. Re: [ct-user] 9.92.001 keying & cty.dat corrections (score: 1): Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>; Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 07:35:48 -0000; According to the DXCC check sheet at ARRL web site: FR/J, E Juan de Nova, Europa AF 53 39 NOT FR/G MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ www.citlink.net/~suzyq/N7mal.htm www.geocities.com/n7mal lemme ask this; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00004.html (8,910 bytes)
19. [ct-user] 10 Mete Lof (score: 1): Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>; Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 05:10:33 -0000; I uploaded my 10 meter contest log and received an error message from the ARRL 'robot'. If someone can tell me what it means I'll correct it. My class was Single-op, low power, cw only. 10 METER CONT; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00038.html (6,743 bytes)
20. Re: [ct-user] Support for NAQP - Wanted ??? (score: 1): Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 23:43:15 -0000; This is so far out of line it is disgusting: "Oh that's right - these are hams... now that Ken has made CT freeware you want him to add more contests to it too so you do not have to buy anything... b; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00078.html (10,310 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]