Mail Archive Search: <+from:BROCK-FISHER>

Results:

References: [ +from:BROCK-FISHER: 43 ]

Total 43 documents matching your query.

21. The Future of CT? (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and2.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Mon, 30 Oct 1995 15:49:59 -0500; Here are some thoughts about what has occurred with the special bits in the various ports for controlling stuff from CT, as well as some possible ideas about the long-term support of CT. I tested 9.2; /archives//html/CT-User/1995-10/msg00097.html (9,371 bytes)
22. max length of RS-232 network link? (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1995 09:55:18 -0400; Bob The maximum length of the RS-232 runs is not affected by the fact the you are using the -LOOP mode of CT. It will solely be determined by the robustness of the particular interfaces you are using; /archives//html/CT-User/1995-07/msg00016.html (7,554 bytes)
23. Signals (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Mon, 24 Jul 1995 12:13:34 -0400; Yes, I have built a relay box for two-radio single op, controlled from CT. It has switch selectable A/B/BOTH, and in BOTH mode CT picks the radio. It goes after the DVK on the mic line, thereby guara; /archives//html/CT-User/1995-07/msg00054.html (6,567 bytes)
24. Best FD Version ?? (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Fri, 23 Jun 1995 11:05:25 -0400; Anybody have a guess on which is the best version to use in FD? We'll be going with 9.20, which at least worked OK in ARRL. With recent problems noted in 9.23, this sounds like our best bet. Anyone h; /archives//html/CT-User/1995-06/msg00028.html (6,597 bytes)
25. CT and IC-736 or IC-738? (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Wed, 1 Mar 1995 13:43:22 -0500; If you have to choose - use the 765 address, not the 735 address. The 765 and 781 will do split from CT - the 735 won't. -Tony, K1KP, fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com -- Submissions: ct-user@eng.pko.dec.com A; /archives//html/CT-User/1995-03/msg00003.html (7,022 bytes)
26. Which Version of CT to use this weekend? (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Fri, 3 Mar 1995 09:51:05 -0500; 9.20 was fine in CW test... -Tony, K1KP, fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com -- Submissions: ct-user@eng.pko.dec.com Administrative requests: ct-user-request@eng.pko.dec.com Problems: reisert@eng.pko.dec.com; /archives//html/CT-User/1995-03/msg00006.html (6,912 bytes)
27. CT9.20 buglist (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Mon, 6 Mar 1995 11:16:50 -0500; Here's my list of bugs, petty complaints, and suggestions after using CT9.20 in ARRL CW and SSB contests: 1. Hitting ALT-DELETE dumps the program. Crash and burn! 2. Leaving the ALT-G (gab) window op; /archives//html/CT-User/1995-03/msg00007.html (7,515 bytes)
28. which version of ct to use this weekend? (score: 1): Author: tony.brock-fisher@bbs.logicnet.com (tony.brock-fisher@bbs.logicnet.com); Date: Tue, 07 Mar 1995 22:45:29; 9.20 was fine in CW test... -Tony, K1KP, fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com -- Submissions: ct-user@eng.pko.dec.com Administrative requests: ct-user-request@eng.pko.dec.com Problems: reisert@eng.pko.dec.com --; /archives//html/CT-User/1995-03/msg00021.html (7,605 bytes)
29. External DVK (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Wed, 29 Mar 1995 08:43:43 -0500; CT supports external DVK's with up to 4 messages. The F1-F4 buttons are mapped to 4 bits in the selected LPT port. This is documented in the manual. I use this feature successfully with a homebrew DV; /archives//html/CT-User/1995-03/msg00073.html (6,119 bytes)
30. POLL command is gone?? (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Mon, 13 Feb 1995 16:11:33 -0500; I see that for the latest rev of CT, the POLL command is gone. Inasmuch as this command was most frequently used to fix radio communication timeouts and lockups, does the removal of the command imply; /archives//html/CT-User/1995-02/msg00007.html (6,695 bytes)
31. Icom IC-765 Timeout (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Tue, 4 Oct 1994 06:45:46 -0400; The timeout problem can be a symptom of RF getting into your rig interface. -Tony, K1KP, fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-10/msg00011.html (6,338 bytes)
32. Single-Multi Bit (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Wed, 5 Oct 1994 07:50:39 -0400; Does anyone know which bit is used to control rig selection in for dual radios in CT9.03 or later? -Tony, K1KP, fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-10/msg00015.html (6,115 bytes)
33. Schizophrenic CT ? (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Mon, 17 Oct 1994 10:34:33 -0400; Just got around to testing CT9.03 beta with 2 radios actually connected. With both radios connected and properly setup, the program gets verrrry slooowwww. The mouse cursor dissappears, and I get an; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-10/msg00044.html (6,963 bytes)
34. 2 Radio Bug(?) in CT9.10A (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Mon, 24 Oct 1994 08:41:44 -0400; I got my copy of CT9.10A in the mail Saturday, and discovered what I hope is only an operator error, but may be a bug. I'm trying to set it up with 2 radios - a 765 and a 735. Whenever I set it up wi; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-10/msg00058.html (6,926 bytes)
35. CT9.13 Bug report (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Mon, 31 Oct 1994 10:48:39 -0500; Ken Here is an official bug report for 9.13 after CQWW: 1. Dupe checking has a bug related to 2-radios. After switching from one radio to another, the dupe checking uses the band information for the; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-10/msg00075.html (8,187 bytes)
36. No Auto repeat ?! (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Fri, 30 Sep 1994 08:17:19 -0400; I can't find the answer to this one in the manual, so it's stupid question time. I finally got around to wiring up a voice keyer to CT. (Not a DVP). I can start messages playing fine manually by hitt; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-09/msg00030.html (6,516 bytes)
37. Dual Rig Control Bit (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Fri, 30 Sep 1994 10:50:48 -0400; Does anyone know which bit of which port got assigned to rig control in CT9.03 or later? -Tony, K1KP, fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-09/msg00032.html (6,151 bytes)
38. CT 9.03 (score: 1): Author: fisher%hp-and.an.hp.com@us4rmc.enet.dec.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Mon, 18 Jul 1994 14:20:43 -0400; Does this mean that CT9.03 will support multi-radios? -Tony, K1KP, fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com % == Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) == % Received: from inet-gw-3.pa.dec.com by us; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-07/msg00026.html (7,084 bytes)
39. 1-Wire CT Network Help (score: 1): Author: ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Tue, 21 Jun 1994 10:17:24 -0400; Help Needed with 1-wire CT Network!! I recall seeing some discussion here about making a CT network work with half the required number of COM ports, by running a single signal wire, from TX on one co; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-06/msg00028.html (6,692 bytes)
40. 1-Wire Net (score: 1): Author: ct-user@sttng.mlo.dec.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Wed, 22 Jun 1994 07:32:55 -0400; We have tried to do the 1-wire network with 3 computers with no success. What happens is that each computer is able to talk only to one nearest neighbor, i.e. the computers downstream don't forward t; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-06/msg00030.html (6,736 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]