Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*good\s+ol\'\s+boys\s+on\s+75m\s+\(fwd\)\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. good ol' boys on 75m (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lufcy <km0l@tyrell.net> (Steve Lufcy)
Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:24 2005
The good ol' boys on 75 meters were in rare form last night during SSB sprint. Maybe cause we went to 75 early- but I have never heard such fowl languaage on the ham bands. The guys on 3850 really le
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00050.html (8,529 bytes)

2. good ol' boys on 75m (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid) (Jim Reid)
Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:24 2005
Why not give them a little publicity? Start spreading their call letters around, e-mail them to the FCC and to the ARRL people who are watch the government regulators. The ARRL ought to be able to ge
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00053.html (8,153 bytes)

3. good ol' boys on 75m (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: Pete Soper <psoper@encore.com> (Pete Soper)
Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:24 2005
These boys don't tend to share their call letters when they're calling "Sou-eee". But if they do, I agree: let's weed out the extra special idiots :-) I'm convinced the only solution is to pretend th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00055.html (8,395 bytes)

4. good ol' boys on 75m (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: Paul Mackanos <pmackano@vortex.weather.brockport.edu> (Paul Mackanos)
Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:24 2005
Another reason to stay in the CW band, 99% of the time. If you do run SSB there in a contest, one time, and remember what happened, you WON'T do it again. Hi, and have a good time, just turn the dial
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00062.html (9,617 bytes)

5. good ol' boys on 75m (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: Pete Soper <psoper@encore.com> (Pete Soper)
Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:24 2005
My mail was about malicious interference, not over-reactions to QRMing by over-eager contesters. Listening to QRM of a net Sunday afternoon put me in a too general frame of mind. -Pete KS4XG
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00068.html (7,518 bytes)

6. good ol' boys on 75m (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: Paul Knupke (CS)" <knupke@babbage.csee.usf.edu (Paul Knupke (CS))
Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:24 2005
Well they own the frequencies, don't they? They interfere with nets, regular qso's, and of course contesters. I can handle the DX contests on 75 with activity being down below 3825 mostly but contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00071.html (8,299 bytes)

7. good ol' boys on 75m (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: KE5FI@aol.com (KE5FI@aol.com)
Date: Mon Feb 5 11:32:11 1996
I agree that IGNORING the malicious interfefers is the best way. Although it won't work if you get too close to their "proprietary" frequency on 75...
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00073.html (7,234 bytes)

8. good ol' boys on 75m (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: AA3JU George Cook <george@epix.net> (AA3JU George Cook)
Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:25 2005
I would add being very annonymous about this! Last time I locked horns with these Bozos Ifound myself under a ver vicious attack using the internet. I thought that I had done myself a favor posting m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00077.html (9,366 bytes)

9. good ol' boys on 75m (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: don.russell@ecrknox.com (don.russell@ecrknox.com)
Date: Mon Feb 5 15:53:06 1996
Steve, I don't get in the sprint contests. I'm either not agressive enough, or a really poor operator! Not fast enough for sure! 75 mtrs is not just a problem in the sprint contests, but in **every c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00083.html (8,252 bytes)

10. good ol' boys on 75m (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: Charles H. Harpole" <harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole)
Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:25 2005
These 75m guys may be the biggest single problem in ham radio today (makes you think we really do not have many problems when seen that way! -- other than tower regs!). What to do? My research in the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00090.html (8,248 bytes)

11. good ol' boys on 75m (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: Steven Sample <aa9ax@iglou.com> (Steven Sample)
Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:25 2005
You know...it's hard enough to try the Sprint with CT not supporting the contest, NA not working with my DVP, and Tree's program having not yet arrived in the mail, and me without a voice to use. (Be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00094.html (10,245 bytes)

12. good ol' boys on 75m (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: Robert <w5robert@blkbox.COM> (Robert)
Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:25 2005
Perhaps the contest should be 20/40/160. This might get alot going on 160 and get away from the 75mtr bunch? -- 73 Robert WB5CRG w5robert@blkbox.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00096.html (7,441 bytes)

13. good ol' boys on 75m (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: Spencer Lazar <slazar19@sgi.net> (Spencer Lazar)
Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:25 2005
** As I say: Dear Honorable Mr. Slim, Let me introduce myself, I am Archiboldas Swinette president of the Association of the 75 Meter Window Police. (I like what you said in your postings about Fish
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00105.html (10,748 bytes)

14. good ol' boys on 75m (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: rhodesj@pionet.net (Jim Rhodes) (Jim Rhodes)
Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:26 2005
If you get less from the FCC than we have with a couple of local idiots jamming and abusing one of our 2 meter repeaters, it would mean that the FCC didn't even answer the phone or open the mail. We
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00128.html (8,424 bytes)

15. good ol' boys on 75m (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: rhodesj@pionet.net (Jim Rhodes) (Jim Rhodes)
Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:26 2005
This is something we have considered, right now we are waiting for the biggest problem to end up in jail for an unrelated state offence (ham on police force!). We have got the unlicensed operator lo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00171.html (7,658 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu