Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*couple\s+of\s+points\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*couple\s+of\s+points\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. couple of points (score: 1): Author: oo7@astro.as.utexas.edu (Derek Wills); Date: Tue Nov 10 17:13:49 1992; Can anyone explain to me why you get 2 points per QSO in the SS? Why not 7 points or 45? - i.e. why not just one? It makes some sense to have different points for cw and ssb QSOs in FD QSOs, differen; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00067.html (7,481 bytes)
2. couple of points (score: 1): Author: price@cod.nosc.mil (James N. Price); Date: Tue Nov 10 15:59:59 1992; -- YES, I know why each QSO in SS is 2 points. It used to be years ago that you got one point for sending an exchange and one point for receiving one. You could have incomplete contacts (one way) in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00068.html (6,812 bytes)
3. couple of points (score: 1): Author: GARLOUGH@TGV.COM (Trey Garlough); Date: Wed Nov 11 07:21:19 1992; It seems that once there was the idea of getting one point for sending your info and one point for receiving his, hence two points per QSO. It may have gone beyond that, in that you might have been; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00080.html (6,760 bytes)
4. couple of points (score: 1): Author: alan@dsd.es.com (Alan Brubaker); Date: Thu Nov 12 09:15:49 1992; In the last few contests that I have participated in, I have signed my call portable 7 or /7 on CW. My perception is that having a 7 somewhere in your call helps your rate because in general, people; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-11/msg00090.html (6,897 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]