Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Why\s+vanity\s+calls\s+on\s+contest\s+reflector\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Why\s+vanity\s+calls\s+on\s+contest\s+reflector\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Why vanity calls on contest reflector? (score: 1): Author: CWMAN1@aol.com (CWMAN1@aol.com); Date: Sat Jun 15 09:31:49 1996; IMOH the comments about the abuse of the system seem to not fit the contest reflector. However, the comments about good/bad callsigns are relative. CONTESTING is the only reason I'm even considering; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-06/msg00096.html (12,413 bytes)
2. Why vanity calls on contest reflector? (score: 1): Author: k4sb@avana.net (k4sb@avana.net); Date: Sat Jun 15 15:45:15 1996; Personally, I think a limited discussion of the Vanity calls is beneficial. One of our sharp eyed brothers has already uncovered a real foul up, and there are more to come. For instance, CA held the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-06/msg00097.html (8,239 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]