- 1. Topband: 2004 ARRL 160M Contest (score: 1)
- Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:28:24 -0600
- I have been asked to once again write the QST article and web page content for the ARRL 160M contest this coming weekend. (RULES) http://www.arrl.org/contests/rules/2004/160-Meters.html I'm told that
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00830.html (10,109 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: 2004 ARRL 160M Contest (score: 1)
- Author: "on4ww" <on4ww@pandora.be>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:21:30 +0100
- Hi Ford and all, I think remembering we discussed what follows, after last year's event. To that regard, I already talked to ARRL people about this, but there was no interest. Haven't read this year'
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00859.html (12,251 bytes)
- 3. RE: Topband: 2004 ARRL 160M Contest (score: 1)
- Author: "Ron Spencer" <ronspencer@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:54:05 -0500
- I too understand EU station's frustration during the 160 contests. I usually look deep for DX because I just enjoy working them. Many, many times a strong NA station is calling CQ just a few hundred
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00896.html (7,697 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu