- 1. Rankings (score: 1)
- Author: tim_coad@smtp.ESL.COM (Tim Coad)
- Date: Thu Jun 10 12:47:32 1993
-
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00051.html (6,456 bytes)
- 2. Rankings (score: 1)
- Author: jholly@hposl42.cup.hp.com (Jim Hollenback)
- Date: Thu Jun 10 14:03:50 1993
- Tim suggests we multiply final score by zip code...Sorry Tim, we can do that...The west coast is geologically unstable and the sudden influx of desparate East Coasters would probably set off 'the big
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00052.html (6,495 bytes)
- 3. Rankings (score: 1)
- Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington)
- Date: Thu Jun 10 16:16:20 1993
- Now, THERE'S something that would compensate for the East Coast advantage! Scott K9MA
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00053.html (6,470 bytes)
- 4. FW: Rankings (score: 1)
- Author: TSkelton@engineer.clemsonsc.NCR.COM (Skelton, Tom)
- Date: Fri Jun 11 11:26:00 1993
- NO, multiplying by your zip code isn't fair. Since the 60/70/80's were the decades of divorce, I think you should get to multiply your score by the number of times you got married. The reasoning behi
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00075.html (7,229 bytes)
- 5. Rankings (score: 1)
- Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington)
- Date: Thu Jun 10 16:16:20 1993
- Now, THERE'S something that would compensate for the East Coast advantage! Scott K9MA
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00170.html (6,452 bytes)
- 6. Rankings (score: 1)
- Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington)
- Date: Thu Jun 10 16:16:20 1993
- Now, THERE'S something that would compensate for the East Coast advantage! Scott K9MA
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00186.html (6,464 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu