- 1. QRP ! (score: 1)
- Author: steven@ulysses.atmos.coloState.edu (Steven London)
- Date: Thu Dec 3 16:24:08 1992
- Since the subject of /QRP has come up, I can't help but to go on a tangent. Back in the good old days of contesting, we went out of our way to be as LOUD as possible. We took pride in tweaking our an
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00045.html (7,442 bytes)
- 2. QRP ! (score: 1)
- Author: price@cod.nosc.mil (James N. Price)
- Date: Thu Dec 3 15:47:33 1992
- -- Alright, you guys--I can't stand it anymore! As a fairly frequent QRPer, I'll tell you why I like to operate QRP. I have a "normal," albeit modest station--a TS-430S with a TH-3 at 35 feet, dipole
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00048.html (8,348 bytes)
- 3. QRP ! (score: 1)
- Author: Doug.Grant@analog.com (Doug.Grant@analog.com)
- Date: Fri Dec 4 11:36:00 1992
- Gee, Steve, didn't you operate QRP in SS a couple of years ago? It seems to me that QRP is more of a challenge for the guy who has to copy the puny signal. Maybe there should be an award for the guy
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00058.html (6,451 bytes)
- 4. QRP ! (score: 1)
- Author: rhealy@arrl.org (Rus Healy NJ2L)
- Date: Mon Dec 7 09:35:36 1992
- In my reply to Steve London's comments about eliminating the QRP categories from contests, I left out a key point that I meant to mention: Steve, I respect your right to your opinion on this subject.
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00083.html (6,189 bytes)
- 5. QRP ! (score: 1)
- Author: rhealy@arrl.org (Rus Healy NJ2L)
- Date: Mon Dec 7 09:09:30 1992
- I disagree strongly with the foregoing. Here's why: Contesting is something most people do for fun. It's simply not worth doing if it's not fun. For some people, only winning is fun. These people usu
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00084.html (8,743 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu