- 1. New topic to throw around... (score: 1)
- Author: larryt@ateq.com (Larry Tyree x 7210)
- Date: Wed Dec 23 11:33:12 1992
- Recently I have experienced some monster pileups which have resulted in the DX station hardly working a station a minute, and eventually resulted in the DX station getting frustrated and going away.
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00233.html (9,692 bytes)
- 2. New topic to throw around... (score: 1)
- Author: mikemr@microsoft.com (Michael Mraz)
- Date: Wed Dec 23 12:49:43 1992
- Yeah, Tree, I heard you on 40 this morning as I was sipping coffee and watching the packetcluster screen ( ;-> ). I heard the pile on the 9K2 but didn't feel like dealing with it. I was also looking
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00235.html (7,919 bytes)
- 3. New topic to throw around... (score: 1)
- Author: mikemr@microsoft.com (Michael Mraz)
- Date: Wed Dec 23 12:51:23 1992
- BTW Tree, there was never a spot on the PNW cluster for that 9K2 this morning. So that leaves out BC, WA, and OR. see ya
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00236.html (6,947 bytes)
- 4. New topic to throw around... (score: 1)
- Author: price@cod.nosc.mil (James N. Price)
- Date: Wed Dec 23 13:15:29 1992
- -- OK, Tree, flame on (politely, of course). I'm a relatively "little guy"--I run a TS-430S barefoot to a TH-3 at 35 feet, dipoles on 40 and 80 at same height. I do have a good canyon rim location th
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00237.html (8,593 bytes)
- 5. New topic to throw around... (score: 1)
- Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington)
- Date: Wed Dec 23 15:20:14 1992
- I agree with all Larry's comments on the packet generated pile-ups. Much of the trouble would go away if there were just some way to prevent anyone from calling before copying the callsign. Limiting
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00239.html (8,317 bytes)
- 6. New topic to throw around... (score: 1)
- Author: reisert@mast.enet.dec.com (Jim Reisert AD1C 23-Dec-1992 1633)
- Date: Wed Dec 23 16:28:51 1992
- --Reply to mail dated 23-DEC-1992 15:17:18.26-- I think it has increased the size of pileups for *medium-rare* DX stations. The very rare DX will always have huge pileups, and the common DX won't hav
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00240.html (9,207 bytes)
- 7. New topic to throw around... (score: 1)
- Author: winter@apple.com (Patty Winter)
- Date: Wed Dec 23 14:07:27 1992
- A worthy goal, Tree, and a logical comparison to contests, but where would we draw the line at "assisted"? If I call a friend on the telephone and say, "Bob, quick--there's a ZA station on 14.180," I
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00242.html (7,461 bytes)
- 8. New topic to throw around... (score: 1)
- Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington)
- Date: Wed Dec 23 15:20:14 1992
- I agree with all Larry's comments on the packet generated pile-ups. Much of the trouble would go away if there were just some way to prevent anyone from calling before copying the callsign. Limiting
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00327.html (8,303 bytes)
- 9. New topic to throw around... (score: 1)
- Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington)
- Date: Wed Dec 23 15:20:14 1992
- I agree with all Larry's comments on the packet generated pile-ups. Much of the trouble would go away if there were just some way to prevent anyone from calling before copying the callsign. Limiting
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-12/msg00373.html (8,302 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu