- 1. N4KG: Re: [CQ-Contest] post contest log corrections (score: 1)
- Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL)
- Date: Sat Jul 4 07:24:52 1998
- On Wed, 1 Jul 1998 03:57:04 -0000 "Dan Evans" <dlevans@hsonline.net> writes: ............................ And why NOT? Lots of guys worked the BIG M/M stations in the CQ WW for the Zone and/or Countr
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00048.html (7,930 bytes)
- 2. N4KG: Re: [CQ-Contest] post contest log corrections (score: 1)
- Author: k5na@bga.com (Richard L. King)
- Date: Sat Jul 4 19:02:30 1998
- I agree. The CQWW has dug themselves into a hole over this. The situation has been created by a combination of two things. First it is possible for a QSO to occur in CQWW where one station gets point
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00053.html (8,874 bytes)
- 3. N4KG: Re: [CQ-Contest] post contest log corrections (score: 1)
- Author: k5na@bga.com (Richard L. King)
- Date: Sat Jul 4 19:02:30 1998
- I agree. The CQWW has dug themselves into a hole over this. The situation has been created by a combination of two things. First it is possible for a QSO to occur in CQWW where one station gets point
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00317.html (8,875 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu