Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*FRAUDULENT\s+MEDICAL\s+CERTIFICATION\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*FRAUDULENT\s+MEDICAL\s+CERTIFICATION\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. FRAUDULENT MEDICAL CERTIFICATION (score: 1): Author: K8DO@aol.com (K8DO@aol.com); Date: Thu Jun 6 18:31:50 1996; Most of the local VE's are disgusted by the percentage of people with medical certification who are obviously gaming the system... two of the VE stalwarts in our area have quit recently, stating that; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-06/msg00030.html (6,825 bytes)
2. FRAUDULENT MEDICAL CERTIFICATION (score: 1): Author: albraun@socketis.net (albraun@socketis.net); Date: Fri Jun 7 01:12:29 1996; Yes so, I'm afraid. We (I'm with the ARRL VEC) are specifically instructed by the VEC NOT to question paperwork that may be fraudulent. That goes not only for MD exemptions, but also for possibly-al; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-06/msg00035.html (9,247 bytes)
3. FRAUDULENT MEDICAL CERTIFICATION (score: 1): Author: WD8AUB@IX.NETCOM.COM (Douglas L. Klein); Date: Fri Jun 7 18:23:30 1996; what does any of this thread have to do with contesting? The following is a copy of a letter I sent to ARRL recently. If you feel like I do, send a note to your ARRL director and/or QST. (I apologize; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-06/msg00042.html (12,088 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]