Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Drop\s+10\s+Minute\s+Rule\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Drop\s+10\s+Minute\s+Rule\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Drop 10 Minute Rule? (score: 1): Author: 72750.3620@CompuServe.COM (H. LAWRENCE SERRA); Date: Mon Jul 12 14:59:36 1993; --de Larry/N6AZE Judging by comments on the reflector about spotty and erratic propagation around the country during IARU, and by experience here (SDGO), is it time to drop the "Stay-On-a-Band-for-at; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-07/msg00074.html (6,723 bytes)
2. Drop 10 Minute Rule? (score: 1): Author: alan@dsd.es.com (Alan Brubaker); Date: Mon Jul 12 15:52:10 1993; Here is why I believe that we need the 10 minute rule for Multi-Single entries; Picture this - a well equipped station with five or six operating positions and enough operators to keep everything goi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-07/msg00076.html (8,585 bytes)
3. Drop 10 Minute Rule? (score: 1): Author: GARLOUGH@tgv.com (Trey Garlough); Date: Tue Jul 13 22:35:17 1993; The 10-minute rule is what makes the M/1 category painful and the M/2 (ARRL) and M/S (CQWW) cateorgies interesting. That ten minute wait seems like an eternity after you work that KP4 on 160 for a n; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-07/msg00109.html (7,527 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]