- 1. CQ's by too few stations (score: 1)
- Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington)
- Date: Wed Jun 9 09:16:45 1993
- There's been lots of discussion here lately about how contests could be made more attractive to more operators, etc. I think we can all agree, big guns and casual operators alike, that more activity
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00034.html (8,069 bytes)
- 2. CQ's by too few stations (score: 1)
- Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington)
- Date: Wed Jun 9 09:16:45 1993
- There's been lots of discussion here lately about how contests could be made more attractive to more operators, etc. I think we can all agree, big guns and casual operators alike, that more activity
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00168.html (8,103 bytes)
- 3. CQ's by too few stations (score: 1)
- Author: sellington@mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington)
- Date: Wed Jun 9 09:16:45 1993
- There's been lots of discussion here lately about how contests could be made more attractive to more operators, etc. I think we can all agree, big guns and casual operators alike, that more activity
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00184.html (8,145 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu