Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*CAC\s+reps\s+\-\s+discussion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*CAC\s+reps\s+\-\s+discussion\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. CAC reps - discussion (score: 1): Author: na2n@ifam.com (Greg Becker NA2N); Date: Sat Dec 21 02:10:16 1996; Preface: this is intended to open a discussion concerning the facts contained herein. It is not intended to point fingers, be accusatory or insulting, or imply any wrongdoing on the part of anyone in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-12/msg00095.html (9,855 bytes)
2. CAC reps - discussion (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@berkshire.net (David Robbins); Date: Sun Dec 22 12:23:16 1996; we don't need emotional responses... what is the documented proceedure for appointments to the CAC and would this appointment follow them? (can you tell that we just went thru iso-2000 audit at work?; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-12/msg00097.html (6,609 bytes)
3. CAC reps - discussion (score: 1): Author: lkay@tiac.net (Leonard Kay); Date: Sun Dec 22 15:36:24 1996; I agree with Dave. Maybe the first thing the Big-Gun-Contest-Club-favored CAC should do is to review and change all the rules of all the major contests to level the playing fields and make sure every; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-12/msg00099.html (7,638 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]