- 1. A necessary response (score: 1)
- Author: WOVERBECK@ccvax.fullerton.edu (WOVERBECK@ccvax.fullerton.edu)
- Date: Wed Aug 7 14:17:59 1996
- This assumes a sequence of events that is the opposite of what really happened. The former ARRL Bio-Effects Commitee and I as an individual filed formal comments with the FCC concerning the RF safety
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-08/msg00031.html (22,347 bytes)
- 2. A necessary response (score: 1)
- Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com)
- Date: Thu Aug 8 11:31:20 1996
- That's interesting. I wonder if the opinions from your group were based on repeatable scientific evidence, or conclusions reached from review of uncontrolled data bases? Physicians that have worked t
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-08/msg00042.html (12,814 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu