- 1. 24-hr proposals (score: 1)
- Author: 71111.260@CompuServe.COM (Hans Brakob K0HB)
- Date: Wed Apr 7 01:47:43 1993
- This responds to Eric K3NA's posting. Generally I like his thinking, and I hope a copy of his comments go to his CAC rep. My reaction is, however, that some portions are overly restrictive and comple
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00031.html (9,798 bytes)
- 2. FW: 24-hr proposals (score: 1)
- Author: TSkelton@engineer.clemsonsc.NCR.COM (Skelton, Tom)
- Date: Wed Apr 7 10:25:00 1993
- main stuff deleted: Ok, reactions? -- eric! K3NA -- WB4IUX: yep, drop the whole darn thing and accept life. The only viable alternative to provide recognition that seems reasonable is K7SS's approach
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00035.html (6,505 bytes)
- 3. 24-hr proposals (score: 1)
- Author: montaguj@CCMSMTP.STPAUL.NCR.COM (John Montague)
- Date: Wed Apr 7 10:47:18 1993
- It is interesting to see the prime elements behind a 'contiguous 24 Hr' catagory come back in Eric's proposal. It seems like a rather complicated, but more flexable, way to accomplish the same end. T
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00037.html (7,637 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu