Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Re\:\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NAQP\s+RTTY\s+160M\s+Survey\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Re\:\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NAQP\s+RTTY\s+160M\s+Survey\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP RTTY 160M Survey (score: 1): Author: w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Wed Aug 7 20:38:36 2002; _________________________________________________________ There is another compensating factor on 160 meters which reduces many of the effects that Bill mentions: Most 160 meter QSOs are at a shorter; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00116.html (7,758 bytes)
2. [RTTY] Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP RTTY 160M Survey (score: 1): Author: jds@twistedoak.com (Jeff Stai); Date: Wed Aug 7 22:11:57 2002; I am thinking out loud here, but I do have some small experience with data recovery in a difficult channel... There are many ways to solve the problem (other than increasing the symbol rate), even wi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00118.html (7,845 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]