Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+wpx\s+ssb\s+spotting\s+report\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+wpx\s+ssb\s+spotting\s+report\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] wpx ssb spotting report (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 01:10:22 -0000; There were a total of 33052 spots in my database for the weekend. Most spotted: DX count HC8N 378 J6DX 243 ZD8Z 236 YW4M 194 NQ4I 191 DR1A 190 V47KP 186 8P5A 183 KP2TM 171 6W1RW 169 5B/AJ2O 163 V31RV; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00360.html (23,965 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] wpx ssb spotting report (score: 1): Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 21:51:37 -0400; Speaking of spotting reports, I was doing a couple searches on DX-Summit to check on the times for a QSO I made with TY5WP, when, to my amazement I found that I had spotted no less than 30 or 40 stat; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00043.html (24,336 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] wpx ssb spotting report (score: 1): Author: Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 22:00:33 -0400; Hi Rich: You left the TNC at N3HBX set to NN3W. We didn't figure out to reset it until after WPX SSB, so we made some spots using your call. (The "hidden" command is MYCALL. I hadn't dealt with a rea; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00046.html (7,879 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] wpx ssb spotting report (score: 1): Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>; Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 14:07:08 +0000; Been busy with antenna repairs and wasn't going to do this, but have had a couple days of bad wx and a couple requests so here it is. I'm sorry if these don't show up with nice column alignment in so; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00125.html (24,194 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] wpx ssb spotting report (score: 1): Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>; Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 14:00:35 +0000; Sorry this is a bit late, but have been doing some major rebuilding on the house since just after wpx ssb weekend so have been a bit busy. This will be shorter than usual, the raw data is available a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00352.html (11,198 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] wpx ssb spotting report (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 13:01:27 -0700; I always love reading this report, and I'm curious what kind of result it has. I'm sure it goes a long way toward encouraging good behavior among those who know it exists, but I wonder if the contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00364.html (8,688 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] wpx ssb spotting report (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 01:37:58 +0000; AB7E said to himself: Sadly, it doesn't seem to be having an impact on dodgy spotting around here. What is perhaps one of the most-often-mentioned dodgy spotters in the reports is from around here &; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00394.html (9,010 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]