Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+why\s+checklog\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+why\s+checklog\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] why checklog? (score: 1): Author: DXer via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 18:11:24 -0400; So true...I used to do that as a much younger PY1. To be honest, there is no way I would do that today, sorry. 73 de Vince, VA3VF _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing li; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00181.html (7,228 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] why checklog? (score: 1): Author: DXer via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 18:04:35 -0400; Participants with a conscience. :^) 73 de Vince, VA3VF == I am writing up the RTTY Roundup article, and in looking at the results data there is a fairly high number of checklogs. I know some of the m; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00184.html (7,657 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] why checklog? (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 22:54:56 -0400; A few years ago, an operator worked a CQWW contest, and in an effort to trim a few seconds off his exchange, he omitted '599' from his exchange. There was a lot of comments after the fact here on the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00190.html (10,324 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] why checklog? (score: 1): Author: charlie@thegallos.com; Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 09:53:39 -0400; Another reason to check log A few years back, I forget what contest, I was working SOLP SSB, when a friend called, and some semi-rare DX had been spotted. He didn't give me a freq, so now I had a cho; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00197.html (8,574 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]